[2013] KEHC 4992 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 4992 (KLR)

The court found that the petitioner, to whom the original grant was issued, was not related to the deceased, and the grant had been properly revoked. The applicants, being sons of the deceased, were entitled to a fresh grant. The respondent, as the son of the petitioner (a stranger to the estate), had no legal right...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 4992 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Timothy Mwakhwa Murutu; Applicant: Jackson Were Murutu; Respondent: James Amukhoye Eshitera
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 142 of 1992
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Revocation of Grant, Letters of Administration, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Injunctive Relief Revocation of Grant Letters of Administration Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Timothy Mwakhwa Murutu

Applicant

Jackson Were Murutu

Applicant

James Amukhoye Eshitera

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application

  1. 1 Whether the respondent should be restrained from constructing or cultivating plot number NORTH WANGA/NAMAMANI/889 pending determination of the succession cause.
  2. 2 Whether the grant of letters of administration issued to the petitioner was properly revoked and a fresh grant should be issued to the objectors jointly.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent has any legal right to deal with the deceased's estate before confirmation of grant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petitioner, to whom the original grant was issued, was not related to the deceased, and the grant had been properly revoked. The applicants, being sons of the deceased, were entitled to a fresh grant. The respondent, as the son of the petitioner (a stranger to the estate), had no legal right to construct or cultivate the estate property. The court held that an injunction was warranted to restrain the respondent from interfering with the estate, but allowed him to continue residing on the land pending finalization of the succession cause. The court further ordered that a fresh grant be issued to the objectors jointly and directed the applicants to apply for...

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The respondent is restrained from constructing or cultivating plot number NORTH WANGA/NAMAMANI/889 pending determination of the succession cause.
  • The respondent shall continue residing on the land pending finalization of the succession cause.