[2002] KECA 170 (KLR)
The court granted the application for extension of time to file and serve the record of appeal because the application was not opposed and both parties had agreed on the terms, including the period for filing and the costs to be paid. The court exercised its discretion in accordance with the agreement of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] KECA 170 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Titus Kiragu; Respondent: Agricultural Development Corporation
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 354 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Record of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application allowed by consent; extension of time granted; costs awarded to respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Costs Award
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Titus Kiragu
Applicant
Agricultural Development Corporation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Record of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to extend time to file and serve the record of appeal.
- 2 Whether costs should be awarded to the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted the application for extension of time to file and serve the record of appeal because the application was not opposed and both parties had agreed on the terms, including the period for filing and the costs to be paid. The court exercised its discretion in accordance with the agreement of the parties, ensuring that the respondent was compensated for the application by awarding agreed costs. The order was made to facilitate the appeal process without unnecessary delay or prejudice to either party.
Court Disposition
Application allowed by consent; extension of time granted; costs awarded to respondent.
Orders
- The record of appeal shall be lodged within 28 days, by 19th March, 2002.
- The respondent shall have costs of this application agreed at KShs.2,000 to be paid within 28 days, failing which execution may issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAKURU
CORAM: SHAH, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 354 OF 2001 (189/01 UR)
BETWEEN
TITUS KIRAGU ............................................................... APPLICANT
AND
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ..........RESPONDENT
(An application for leave to extend time to file and serve the record of appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nakuru (Rimita J) dated 22nd September, 2000
in
NKR. H.C.C.C. NO. 111 OF 1999)
*********************
R U L I N G
This application is not being opposed. Counsel have agreed that the record of appeal be lodged within the next 28 days. Costs are also agreed. In the circumstances I order that the record of appeal be lodged within the next 28 days, that is, by 19th March, 2002. The respondent will have costs of this application agreed at KShs.2,000/= to be paid within 28 days failing which execution may issue.
Dated and delivered at Nakuru this 19th day of February, 2002.
A.B. SHAH
........................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR