[2019] KEELC 850 (KLR)
The court held that the burden of proving the nexus between Machakos Town Block 3/288 and plot number 1887 lies with the Defendant, who asserts that they are the same parcel. The court emphasized that, under the adversarial system, it is not the court's role to assist a party in gathering evidence. The Defendant is...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 850 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Titus Ngenye Muthama; Plaintiff: Anne Ndunge Ngenye; Defendant: Angelina Nzioka
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 72 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- OA Angote
- Legal Topics
- Land Ownership Dispute, Title Verification, Burden of Proof, Admissibility of Evidence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Titus Ngenye Muthama
Plaintiff
Anne Ndunge Ngenye
Plaintiff
Angelina Nzioka
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should order the Machakos County Lands Registrar and Surveyor to provide reports on the ownership and location of Machakos Town Block 3/288 before hearing the main suit.
- 2 Whether it is the court's role to assist a party in gathering evidence to prove their case.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the burden of proving the nexus between Machakos Town Block 3/288 and plot number 1887 lies with the Defendant, who asserts that they are the same parcel. The court emphasized that, under the adversarial system, it is not the court's role to assist a party in gathering evidence. The Defendant is at liberty to hire a qualified surveyor to prepare a report but cannot invoke the court's powers to direct government officials to obtain evidence on their behalf. Consequently, the application seeking court orders to compel the Machakos County Lands Registrar and Surveyor to provide reports was found to be unmeritorious and dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The Notice of Motion dated 11th June, 2019 is dismissed with costs to the Plaintiffs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MACHAKOS
ELC. CASE NO. 72 OF 2017
TITUS NGENYE MUTHAMA........................................1ST PLAINTIFF
ANNE NDUNGE NGENYE ...........................................2ND PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
ANGELINA NZIOKA.........................................................DEFENDANT
RULING
1. In the Notice of Motion dated 11th June, 2019, the Defendant is seeking for the following orders:
a.That the Machakos County Lands Registrar be and is hereby ordered to issue to the court a report on the ownership status of the land known as Machakos Town Block 3/288 before hearing of the main suit herein.
b.That the Machakos County Lands Surveyor be and is hereby ordered to issue to the court a report on the location of the land known as Machakos Town Block 3/288 before hearing of the main suit herein and;
c.That the costs of this Application be provided for.
2. The Application is premised on the grounds that the parties are not in agreement as to who owns land which was formally known as Plot No. 1887 measuring 2. 04 acres and that pursuant to the Ruling of this court delivered on 28th September, 2018, it is prudent to have the aforementioned reports produced in court.
3. In her Affidavit, the Defendant has deponed that it is prudent to have the official report from the Machakos County Land Registrar and Surveyor on the status of the suit property to enable the court to determine the issue of ownership of the land and location of the same.
4. In response, the Plaintiffs’ advocate deponed that it is only the court that has the requisite jurisdiction to determine the issues raised in the litigant’s respective pleadings; that the Defendant’s purported title documents stem from fraudulent dealings and that in filing the current Application, the Defendant is exhibiting signs of guilt. None of the parties filed written submissions.
5. In their Plaint, the Plaintiffs alleged that they are the lawful owners of plot number 1887 measuring approximately 2½ acres which they bought from Johnson Kimeu and that the Defendant has been trying to unlawfully access the said land.
6. In the Defence, the Defendant averred that she is the registered proprietor of land known as Machakos Town Block 3/288 (formerly Plot No. 1887 RM 288) having purchased it from one Joseph Nzioki Mbuvi. The Defendant/Applicant has annexed on her Affidavit a copy of the Title Deed for the said land.
7. In the Ruling of this court delivered on 28th September, 2018, the court observed as follows:
“10. Indeed, there is no evidence before me to show the nexus between parcel numbers Machakos Town Block 3/288 and plot number 1887. Except for a copy of the letter dated 4th August, 1998, the Defendant has not attempted to file a report by a surveyor to show that the two parcels of land are one and the same.”
8. It would appear that the current Application was filed in response to the above observation by the court. It is trite that a party who alleges has the burden of proving the existence of facts which he asserts.
9. If the Defendant’s case is that parcel of land known as Machakos Town Block 3/288 is the same as plot number 1887, then the burden of proving that fact lies with him. Our legal system being adversarial in nature, this court cannot step into the arena of litigation by assisting the Defendant in obtaining evidence, which he is seeking to do in the current Application.
10. Indeed, nothing bars the Defendant from hiring a qualified Surveyor to prepare a report to show the nexus between the two plots, and not to invoke the powers of the court to direct government officials to scout evidence for him.
11. In the circumstances, I find the Application dated 11th June, 2019 to be unmeritorious. The Application is therefore dismissed with costs.
DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED IN MACHAKOS THIS 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019.
O.A. ANGOTE
JUDGE