[2019] KEHC 1538 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 1538 (KLR)

The respondent was duly served with the court order requiring him to submit for a DNA test upon reimbursement of Kshs.12,750. The applicant demonstrated compliance by reimbursing the required amount through the respondent's counsel. The respondent failed to comply with the order and did not oppose the application...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 1538 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: TMN; Respondent: JM
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 125 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Contempt Application
Outcome
application allowed; respondent found in contempt and committed to civil jail for four months unless contempt is purged; costs to applicant
Judges
A Ali-Aroni
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Children Custody Orders, Enforcement of Court Orders
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Children Custody Orders Enforcement of Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

TMN

Applicant

JM

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Contempt Application

  1. 1 Whether the respondent disobeyed the Children’s Court order requiring submission for a DNA test upon reimbursement of costs.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent should be committed to civil jail for contempt of court.

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent was duly served with the court order requiring him to submit for a DNA test upon reimbursement of Kshs.12,750. The applicant demonstrated compliance by reimbursing the required amount through the respondent's counsel. The respondent failed to comply with the order and did not oppose the application for contempt. The court found that the respondent's failure to obey the order constituted contempt of court and, as a result, committed the respondent to four months imprisonment unless and until the contempt is purged.

Court Disposition

application allowed; respondent found in contempt and committed to civil jail for four months unless contempt is purged; costs to applicant

Orders

  • The respondent is found in contempt of the Children’s Court order issued on 7th March 2017.
  • The respondent is committed to four months imprisonment unless and until the contempt is purged.