[2024] KEELC 1426 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 1426 (KLR)

The court found that the original plaintiff, John Toboso, died on 2nd July 2007. No order for substitution was made within one year, and the suit abated on 2nd July 2008 by operation of law under Order 24 rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Although the present plaintiff filed an application for revival, he did not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 1426 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Joseph Juma Toboso (Suing in his capacity as the legal representative of the Estate of Toboso Andati Malala); Defendant: Elfas Juma Mudogo (Sued in his capacity as the legal representative of Philip Mutoko); Defendant: Henry Chimasia; Defendant: Julius Musungu; Defendant: Joseck Mukhwana
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 101 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Judgment
Outcome
suit abated and file closed
Judges
DO Ohungo
Legal Topics
Abatement of Suit, Adverse Possession, Substitution of Parties, Revival of Suit
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Abatement of Suit Adverse Possession Substitution of Parties Revival of Suit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Juma Toboso (Suing in his capacity as the legal representative of the Estate of Toboso Andati Malala)

Plaintiff

Elfas Juma Mudogo (Sued in his capacity as the legal representative of Philip Mutoko)

Defendant

Henry Chimasia

Defendant

Julius Musungu

Defendant

Joseck Mukhwana

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether there is a valid suit before the court in light of the plaintiff's death and procedural steps taken.
  2. 2 Whether adverse possession has been established by the plaintiff.
  3. 3 Whether the reliefs sought by the plaintiff should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the original plaintiff, John Toboso, died on 2nd July 2007. No order for substitution was made within one year, and the suit abated on 2nd July 2008 by operation of law under Order 24 rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Although the present plaintiff filed an application for revival, he did not seek substitution or provide evidence of being the administrator of the estate. No order for revival was made. Consequently, there was no valid suit before the court, and the court declined to determine the substantive issues of adverse possession or the reliefs sought. The suit was declared abated and the file ordered closed.

Court Disposition

suit abated and file closed

Orders

  • This suit abated on 2nd July 2008.
  • The file be closed pursuant to Order 24 rule 3 (2) of the Civil Procedure Rules.