[2025] KEELRC 418 (KLR)

[2025] KEELRC 418 (KLR)

The court held that although the Work Injury Benefits Act does not expressly provide for the enforcement of the Director's awards, it does not oust the Employment and Labour Relations Court's jurisdiction to enforce such awards where no objection has been lodged under Section 51(1) of the Act. The respondent failed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELRC 418 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gibson Chunguli Tocho; Respondent: Jamun City Construction Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Cause E190 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling on Unopposed Application to Adopt Director's Assessment as Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed. Director's award adopted as judgment. Interest awarded. Each party to bear own costs.
Judges
AK Nzei
Legal Topics
Work Injury Benefits, Compensation Assessment, Enforcement of Awards, Jurisdiction of Elrc
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Work Injury Benefits Compensation Assessment Enforcement of Awards Jurisdiction of Elrc

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gibson Chunguli Tocho

Applicant

Jamun City Construction Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling on Unopposed Application to Adopt Director's Assessment as Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Employment and Labour Relations Court has jurisdiction to adopt and enforce an award of compensation made by the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services under the Work Injury Benefits Act.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the assessed sum where the respondent has not objected to the Director's award.
  3. 3 Whether interest and costs should be awarded to the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that although the Work Injury Benefits Act does not expressly provide for the enforcement of the Director's awards, it does not oust the Employment and Labour Relations Court's jurisdiction to enforce such awards where no objection has been lodged under Section 51(1) of the Act. The respondent failed to object to or settle the Director's assessment of compensation, and the application was unopposed. The court found that the applicant was entitled to have the Director's award adopted as a judgment of the court, with interest from the date of filing. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Director's award adopted as judgment. Interest awarded. Each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • The award of Kshs.460,800 made by the Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services on 31st October, 2023 in favour of the applicant is adopted as a judgment of the court.
  • Judgment is entered for the applicant against the respondent in the sum of Kshs.460,800.