[2025] KECA 1054 (KLR)

[2025] KECA 1054 (KLR)

The application for substitution was filed outside the 12-month period stipulated by Rule 102 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022. The 2nd respondent died on 14th January 2022, and the application was filed on 21st February 2023, exceeding the statutory period even after accounting for the Christmas recess. As a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECA 1054 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Agnes Jerotich Toloin (Suing as the legal Representative of the Estate of the Late Jonah Kipsaina); Respondent: Rael Tarlock Sawe Philip Kiprock Sawe Francis Kipkemboi Sawe (All Suing as the Legal Representatives of the Late David Cheptum Sawe); Respondent: Kiprono Arap Toroitich; Respondent: Francis Kipsang Kimutai (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Estate of the Late Wilson Kimutai Cherop); Respondent: Attorney General; Respondent: Chief Land Registrar; Respondent: John Kosgei Toroitich (Legal Representative of the Estate of the Late Toroitich Cheboi)
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application E035 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Substitution of Party
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
MA Warsame
Legal Topics
Party Substitution, Abatement of Appeal, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Party Substitution Abatement of Appeal Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Agnes Jerotich Toloin (Suing as the legal Representative of the Estate of the Late Jonah Kipsaina)

Applicant

Rael Tarlock Sawe Philip Kiprock Sawe Francis Kipkemboi Sawe (All Suing as the Legal Representatives of the Late David Cheptum Sawe)

Respondent

Kiprono Arap Toroitich

Respondent

Francis Kipsang Kimutai (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Estate of the Late Wilson Kimutai Cherop)

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Chief Land Registrar

Respondent

John Kosgei Toroitich (Legal Representative of the Estate of the Late Toroitich Cheboi)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Substitution of Party

  1. 1 Whether the application for substitution of the deceased 2nd respondent was filed within the statutory period required by the Court of Appeal Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the appeal had abated due to lapse of the statutory period for substitution.

Ratio Decidendi

The application for substitution was filed outside the 12-month period stipulated by Rule 102 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022. The 2nd respondent died on 14th January 2022, and the application was filed on 21st February 2023, exceeding the statutory period even after accounting for the Christmas recess. As a result, the appeal had abated by operation of law, and the application for substitution could not be entertained. The court emphasized that the correct legal framework for substitution in the Court of Appeal is Rule 102, not the Civil Procedure Rules, and strict compliance with the timelines is mandatory. Consequently, the application was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for substitution is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.