[2021] KEHC 5394 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 5394 (KLR)

The court found that, despite the delay in prosecuting the appeal, the applicant had demonstrated sufficient diligence by repeatedly requesting necessary documents from the lower court, which had not been provided. The court noted that the issue of service of the dismissal application had already been determined in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 5394 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Tononoka Rolling Mills Limited; Respondent: Albert Kioko Mutuku
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 61 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Appeal
Outcome
application allowed; appeal reinstated; stay of execution reinstated
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha, JK Sergon
Legal Topics
Reinstatement of Appeal, Setting Aside Orders, Stay of Execution, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Reinstatement of Appeal Setting Aside Orders Stay of Execution Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tononoka Rolling Mills Limited

Appellant

Albert Kioko Mutuku

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the court should set aside its earlier ruling dismissing the appeal and reinstate the appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was properly served with the application for dismissal and/or hearing notice.
  3. 3 Whether a stay of execution of the lower court judgment should be reinstated pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, despite the delay in prosecuting the appeal, the applicant had demonstrated sufficient diligence by repeatedly requesting necessary documents from the lower court, which had not been provided. The court noted that the issue of service of the dismissal application had already been determined in the previous ruling and could not be revisited. However, in the interest of substantive justice, and considering the applicant's efforts and the unavailability of the lower court file, the court exercised its discretion to set aside the earlier dismissal order and reinstate the appeal. The court further found it reasonable to reinstate the stay of execution previously granted,...

Court Disposition

application allowed; appeal reinstated; stay of execution reinstated

Orders

  • The ruling and order made on 11th March, 2021 dismissing the appeal is set aside and the appeal reinstated.
  • The Executive Officer (Chief Magistrate’s Court-Milimani Commercial Courts) shall avail certified copies of the typed proceedings, judgment delivered on 29th January, 2018 and decree in Milimani CMCC NO. 939 OF 2016 to the appellant/applicant within 20 days.