[2017] KEELRC 321 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent failed to provide evidence that the claimant absconded duty or that reasonable attempts were made to contact him before termination. The respondent did not produce any documentation or testimony to show efforts to reach the claimant or to justify the termination. The court held...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELRC 321 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Tony Karimi Kathumi; Respondent: Alkem Laboratories
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1285 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- claim allowed in part
- Judges
- DI Wasike
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Absconding Duty, Burden of Proof, Terminal Dues
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tony Karimi Kathumi
Claimant
Alkem Laboratories
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly terminated from employment.
- 2 Whether the respondent proved that the claimant absconded duty.
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to terminal dues and compensation for unfair termination.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent failed to provide evidence that the claimant absconded duty or that reasonable attempts were made to contact him before termination. The respondent did not produce any documentation or testimony to show efforts to reach the claimant or to justify the termination. The court held that the burden of proof for fair termination lies with the employer, and in the absence of such proof, the termination is deemed unfair. Consequently, the claimant was entitled to compensation for unfair termination, notice pay, costs, and a certificate of service.
Court Disposition
claim allowed in part
Orders
- The respondent shall pay the claimant one month’s salary in lieu of notice (Kshs. 50,000).
- The respondent shall pay the claimant five months’ salary for unfair termination (Kshs. 250,000).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF
KENYA AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NUMBER 1285 OF 2015
TONY KARIMI KATHUMI………..CLAIMANT
VERSUS
ALKEM LABORATORIES…......RESPONDENT
JUDGEMENT
1. The claimant testified that he was employed by the respondent from April, 2013 to October 2014 when he got dismissed. He used to work as a medical representative. His role was to market products at this chemist level and meet doctors who would give the respondent business. He would thereafter collect payments and prepare monthly reports.
2. During the course of his employment with the respondent he never had any problems and his performance was good. On 31st October, 2014 he was in the field when he received an sms to go to the office and when he went his line manager told him the company had decided not to pay him another months salary. He was surprised by the communication.
3. In cross examination he denied ever absconding duty and further denied ever resigning from work. He however stated that he was asked to write a resignation letter before he could be paid his terminal dues but he never wrote the letter. He however admitted receiving one warning letter two weeks before he was dismissed.
4. The respondent’s witness Mr Nikhilesh Sarivatsava stated that he was the respondent’s country manager. It was his evidence that every employee was issued a target and that the claimant was not following the standard operating procedures. The issue was severally discussed with him and that his line manager issued him with a warning letter.
5. According to him the claimant last went to the office at the end of October and that his last report was filed on 24th October. According to him, the respondent did not terminate the claimant’s services. It was the claimant who absconded duties. He further informed the court that the respondent had no problem paying the claimant his terminal dues. In cross-examination he stated that no show cause meeting was called.
6. The onus of proof or justification of reason for dismissal or termination of employment is with the employer. The claimant was accused of absconding duty yet the respondent did not produce any evidence nor allege that any attempt was made to contact the claimant without success. In a case of dismissal on grounds of absconding duties, the employer must show that reasonable attempts were made to contact the employee but without success. No such proof was laid before the court. In the circumstances the court finds and holds that the respondent failed to prove the reason for terminating the claimants services.
7. The court therefore finds and holds that the termination was unfair and hereby awards the claimant as follows:
Kshs.
a. One month’s salary in lieu of notice 50,000
b. Five months salary for unfair termination of service 250,000
300,000
c. Costs of the suit.
d. The respondent to issue the claimant with a certificate of service.
8. It is so ordered.
Dated at Nairobi this 10th day of November, 2017
Abuodha J. N.
Judge
Delivered this 10th day of November, 2017
Abuodha J. N.
Judge
In the presence of:-
……………………………….for the Claimant and
……………………………….for the Respondent.