[2023] KEELC 20056 (KLR)
The court held that although the affidavits and submissions in question were filed out of time and without leave, the overriding objective of the court is to do substantive justice to all parties. Strict adherence to procedural technicalities should not override the need for a fair hearing, especially where no party...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELC 20056 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Toshike Construction Co. Ltd; Plaintiff: Danns Jungle Investments Ltd; Plaintiff: Wokabi Mwago; Defendant: Kuku Singh Alias Sokhi; Defendant: Nairobi City County Government; Defendant: National Environment Management Authority; Defendant: National Construction Authority; Defendant: Mansaat Holdings Limited; Defendant: Fuad Hussein; Defendant: Stephen Gathuita Mwangi; Defendant: Patrick Analo Akivaga; Defendant: Mamo Boru Mamo; Defendant: Daniel Wanjiru; Defendant: Maurice Aketch MBS; Defendant: Eng. Kanda Bowen; Defendant: Silas John Sanya Ogengo
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case E058 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Interlocutory Application; Ruling on Admissibility of Affidavits and Submissions Filed Out of Time
- Outcome
- Affidavits and submissions filed out of time admitted on record, subject to service and right of response.
- Judges
- MD Mwangi
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Affidavits, Late Filing of Submissions, Procedural Fairness, Natural Justice
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Toshike Construction Co. Ltd
Plaintiff
Danns Jungle Investments Ltd
Plaintiff
Wokabi Mwago
Plaintiff
Kuku Singh Alias Sokhi
Defendant
Nairobi City County Government
Defendant
National Environment Management Authority
Defendant
National Construction Authority
Defendant
Mansaat Holdings Limited
Defendant
Fuad Hussein
Defendant
Stephen Gathuita Mwangi
Defendant
Patrick Analo Akivaga
Defendant
Mamo Boru Mamo
Defendant
Daniel Wanjiru
Defendant
Maurice Aketch MBS
Defendant
Eng. Kanda Bowen
Defendant
Silas John Sanya Ogengo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Interlocutory Application; Ruling on Admissibility of Affidavits and Submissions Filed Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether affidavits and submissions filed out of time and without leave of court should be admitted on record.
- 2 Whether admitting such documents would prejudice the plaintiffs and violate rules of natural justice.
- 3 Whether the court should prioritize substantive justice over procedural technicalities in the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that although the affidavits and submissions in question were filed out of time and without leave, the overriding objective of the court is to do substantive justice to all parties. Strict adherence to procedural technicalities should not override the need for a fair hearing, especially where no party will be unduly prejudiced if given an opportunity to respond. The court therefore admitted the further affidavit by Swanya & Company Advocates, the Replying Affidavit by the National Construction Authority, and the late submissions by the 4th, 5th, 11th, 12th, and 13th defendants, on condition that they be served on all parties within 24 hours and that the plaintiffs be...
Court Disposition
Affidavits and submissions filed out of time admitted on record, subject to service and right of response.
Orders
- The further affidavit by Swanya & Company Advocates and the Replying Affidavit by the National Construction Authority, as well as submissions by the 4th, 5th, 11th, 12th, and 13th defendants, are admitted on record.
- These documents must be served upon the plaintiffs and all other respondents within 24 hours.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
54 paragraphs
Toshike Construction Co. Ltd & 2 others v Sokhi & 12 others (Environment & Land Case E058 of 2023) [2023] KEELC 20056 (KLR) (26 September 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 20056 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Environment & Land Case E058 of 2023
MD Mwangi, J
September 26, 2023
Between
Toshike Construction Co. Ltd
1st Plaintiff
Danns Jungle Investments Ltd
2nd Plaintiff
Wokabi Mwago
3rd Plaintiff
and
Kuku Singh Alias Sokhi
1st Defendant
Nairobi City County Government
2nd Defendant
National Environment Management Authority
3rd Defendant
National Construction Authority
4th Defendant
Mansaat Holdings Limited
5th Defendant
Fuad Hussein
6th Defendant
Stephen Gathuita Mwangi
7th Defendant
Patrick Analo Akivaga
8th Defendant
Mamo Boru Mamo
9th Defendant
Daniel Wanjiru
10th Defendant
Maurice Aketch MBS
11th Defendant
Eng. Kanda Bowen
12th Defendant
Silas John Sanya Ogengo
13th Defendant
Ruling
1. On 4th July, 2023, this Court issued directions in respect of the Plaintiffs’ application dated 6th April, 2023, the 1st Defendant’s Application dated 18th April, 2023 and the Preliminary Objection by the 4th, 11th, 12th and 13th Defendants dated 17th April, 2023. The Court directed that they all be heard together and by way of written submissions. The Plaintiffs were to file and serve their submissions in 14 days from the 4th of July, 2023. The Respondents were to file their submissions in 14 days after service of the Plaintiffs’ submissions.
2. On 31st July, 2023 however, Mr. Mavisi holding brief for Mr. Thongori for the Plaintiffs informed the court that they were unable to comply with the timelines given by the court and only managed to serve their submissions on 28th July, 2023, 24 days after the issuance of the directions. On his part, Mr. Adano for the 5th Defendant who was also holding brief for Mr. Haji for the 1st Defendant informed the court that he had not managed to file his submissions having only been served by the Plaintiffs on 28th July, 2023. Mr. Kuria, advocate for the 2nd, 7th and 8th Defendants too sought more time to file and serve his submissions.
Subsequent developments: 3. The court record shows that on 23rd August, 2023, the Law Firm of Swanya & Company Advocates filed a further affidavit sworn by Wilfred Masinde, the acting Deputy Director, Planning Compliance and Enforcement of Nairobi City County on the same date. The 5th Respondent’s submissions were filed on 7th September, 2023.
4. On 20th September, 2023, the National Construction Authority, the 4th Defendant herein filed a Replying Affidavit sworn by its manager compliance, one Stephen Mwilu in response to the Plaintiffs’ amended Notice of Motion Application dated 6th April, 2023. On the same date, submissions were filed on behalf of the 4th, 11th, 12th and 13th Respondents. A list of authorities cited in the submissions was filed yesterday.
Decision of the Court 5. The Court on 31st July, 2023 granted the Respondents only a further 7 days to file and serve their submissions. No party sought leave of the Court to file a Replying or Further Affidavit. Therefore, no such leave was granted to any of the parties.
6. The further affidavit filed by the Law Firm of Swanya & Company Advocates and the Replying Affidavit filed by the National Construction Authority were therefore filed without leave of the Court. It is not even clear whether the affidavits were served upon the Plaintiffs/Applicants and the other Respondents. No affidavits of service have been filed to prove service of these affidavits.
7. The submissions of the 4th, 5th, 11th, 12th and 13th Respondents too were filed out of the time granted to the parties to file their submissions.
8. Admitting, especially the affidavits on record without having afforded the Plaintiffs an opportunity to consider the averments therein and respond appropriately, would definitely and unfairly prejudice the Plaintiffs whose application is pending determination. The affidavits address issues raised in the application. It is contrary to the rules of natural justice.
9. The business of this Court is to do justice to all the parties at all times and in all circumstances.
10. I have no doubt in my mind that this Court has the inherent authority to expunge the affidavits and any other documents for that matter filed without its leave or out of the time given. However, and in order to do justice, this Court will not constrain or hamstring itself in a straightjacket of procedural technicalities. Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution of Kenya (2010) indeed implores this Court to administer justice without undue regard to procedural technicalities.
11. I find it necessary, taking into consideration the circumstances of this case to rise to the higher calling of this Court to do justice by admitting on record the further affidavit filed by the Law Firm of Swanya & Company Advocates as well as the Replying Affidavit filed by the National Construction Authority and the submissions by the 4th, 5th, 11th, 12th & 13th Defendants. The same must however be served upon the Plaintiffs and all the other Respondents within the next 24 hours. The Plaintiffs shall have leave to file and serve a further affidavit and supplementary submissions within 7 days after service, should they deem it necessary.It is so ordered.
RULING DATED, SIGNED & DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023. M. D MWANGIJUDGEIn the virtual presence of:Mr. Mavisi holding brief for Thongori for the Plaintiffs/Applicants.Mr. Adano for the 5th Defendant/Respondent, also holding brief for Mr. Haji for the 1st Defendant.Mr. Kuria for the 2nd, 7th and 8th Defendant/RespondentNo appearance for the 3rd, 4th, 6th, 9th, 10th, 11th 12th, & 13th Defendants/Respondents.