[2006] KEHC 1061 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had complied with all statutory requirements under the Arbitration Act 1995 and the Arbitration Rules 1997 for enforcement of an arbitral award. The arbitral award, made by a duly appointed arbitrator, was final and had been filed in court. The respondent had failed to pay the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1061 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Total Kenya Limited; Defendant: Charles Kivevo Muasya
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 19 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Chamber Summons for Enforcement of Arbitral Award
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- JL Osiemo
- Legal Topics
- Arbitral Award Enforcement, Arbitration Act Application, Marketing Licence Dispute
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Total Kenya Limited
Applicant
Charles Kivevo Muasya
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Chamber Summons for Enforcement of Arbitral Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to enforce the arbitral award as a decree of the court.
- 2 Whether the applicant has complied with the requirements of the Arbitration Act 1995 and Arbitration Rules 1997 for enforcement of an arbitral award.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had complied with all statutory requirements under the Arbitration Act 1995 and the Arbitration Rules 1997 for enforcement of an arbitral award. The arbitral award, made by a duly appointed arbitrator, was final and had been filed in court. The respondent had failed to pay the awarded sum despite demand. There was no evidence of any procedural or substantive defect in the arbitration process or the award. Accordingly, the court granted leave to the applicant to enforce the arbitral award as a decree of the court, together with costs of the application.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Leave is granted to the applicant to enforce the arbitral award dated 31st May 2005 as a decree of the court.
- The respondent shall pay the applicant the sum of KES 2,879,608.50 as awarded by the arbitrator.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Misc Appli 19 of 2006
IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1995
LAWS OF KENYA
AND
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
BETWEEN
TOTAL KENYA LIMITED……………………..…..........................................…………APPLICANT
VERSUS
CHARLES KIVEVO MUASYA……………...........................................…………….DEFENDANT
RULING
By this ex parte Chamber Summons expressed to be brought under Section 36 of the Arbitration Act 1995 and Rule 6 of the Arbitration Rules 1997, the Claimant/Applicant seeks orders that leave be granted to enforce as a Decree, the Final Award made on 31st May 2005 by the Arbitration herein Ms Njeri Kariuki. The claimant also asks for the costs of this application. The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by Franklin Juma the Legal Manager of the Claimant Company in which he avers that by an Arbitration Agreement contained in Clause 42 (b) of a Marketing Licence Agreement (“the agreement’) the Claimant and the Respondent (the Respondent) agreed to submit to arbitration, inter alia any such disputes as may arise between them under the Policy; that a dispute having arisen the Claimant instituted a suit in court being HCCC NO. 256 OF 2000, subsequently pursuant to Clause 42 (b) of the Agreement, the dispute was referred to Arbitration; that Ms Njeri Kariuki was appointed Arbitrator; that upon consideration of the parties respective evidence and submissions the Arbitrator published her Final Award on the 31st May 2000 wherein she awarded the Claimant a sum of Sh.1,561,045. 50 being the amount admitted by the Respondent as due and owing to the Claimant and interest at 12. 6% per annum which computed interest amounted to a sum of Shs.1,318,563. 10; that the total amount due being Sh.2,879,608. 50.
Counsel for the Claimant submitted that despite demand being made by the Claimant upon the Respondent to pay the said sum of Shs.2,879,608. 60 the Respondent has refused, neglected and/or otherwise failed to pay the said sum of part thereof and that on the 13th January 2006 the said Final Award was filed in court pursuant to the Provisions of Rule 4 (2) of the Arbitration Rules 1995.
I am satisfied that the Claimant has complied with the Provisions of the Arbitration Act of 1995 as per the law required and I do allow this application in terms of Prayer 1 and 2 and 3 of the ex pate chamber Summons dated 4th April 2006.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 20th day of July 2006.
J.L.A. OSIEMO
JUDGE