[2023] KEELRC 350 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 350 (KLR)

The court held that the mode of service sought by the applicant—service by registered post to the respondent's last known postal address—is expressly provided for under Rule 12(1) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules 2016. Therefore, the applicant does not require leave of the court to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 350 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Carolyne Totari; Respondent: Diani Beach School Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 898 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Serve by Registered Post
Outcome
application marked as spent; directions issued for mention
Judges
AK Nzei
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Substituted Service, Court Procedure
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Service of Process Substituted Service Court Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Carolyne Totari

Applicant

Diani Beach School Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Serve by Registered Post

  1. 1 Whether the applicant requires leave of the court to effect service of court process by registered post to the respondent's last known postal address.
  2. 2 Whether the application for leave to serve by registered post is necessary under the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules 2016.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the mode of service sought by the applicant—service by registered post to the respondent's last known postal address—is expressly provided for under Rule 12(1) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules 2016. Therefore, the applicant does not require leave of the court to effect such service. The application for leave was unnecessary, and the applicant should proceed to serve the respondent in accordance with the rules. The court marked the application as spent and directed the matter to be mentioned for further directions.

Court Disposition

application marked as spent; directions issued for mention

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated September 10, 2019 is marked as spent.
  • The suit shall be mentioned in court on March 9, 2023 for appropriate directions.