[2017] KEELC 2876 (KLR)
The court found that the Plaintiff had proved on a balance of probabilities that the suit properties were reserved for public purposes and that the letters of allotment used by the 1st Defendant to obtain leases and certificates of leases were forgeries, as confirmed by the Commissioner of Lands. Consequently, the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 2876 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: The Town Council of Kilifi; Defendant: Isaac Juma Obila t/a Lavington Milk Bar; Defendant: Commissioner of Lands; Defendant: Attorney General
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 147 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Land and Property Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's suit allowed in full.
- Judges
- OA Angote, JO Olola
- Legal Topics
- Public Land Allocation, Fraudulent Land Titles, Cancellation of Title, Public Utilities, Injunctive Relief
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Town Council of Kilifi
Plaintiff
Isaac Juma Obila t/a Lavington Milk Bar
Defendant
Commissioner of Lands
Defendant
Attorney General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit properties are public utility plots reserved for public purposes.
- 2 Whether the issuance of leases and certificates of leases to the 1st Defendant was fraudulent and void.
- 3 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to cancellation of the leases and certificates of leases issued to the 1st Defendant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Plaintiff had proved on a balance of probabilities that the suit properties were reserved for public purposes and that the letters of allotment used by the 1st Defendant to obtain leases and certificates of leases were forgeries, as confirmed by the Commissioner of Lands. Consequently, the subsequent leases and certificates of leases issued to the 1st Defendant were fraudulent and void ab initio. The Defendants failed to attend court or rebut the Plaintiff's evidence. The court held that the Plaintiff was entitled to a declaration that the suit properties are public utility plots, cancellation of the fraudulent leases and certificates, and a permanent injunction...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's suit allowed in full.
Orders
- A declaration is issued that parcels L.R. Nos. 5054/771, 5054/772, and 5054/773 (now Kilifi/Township Block 3/416, 3/417, and 3/418) are public utility plots and the leases and certificates of leases issued to Isaac Juma Obila are fraudulent and void ab initio.
- The 1st Defendant is ordered to surrender the leases and certificates of leases to the 2nd Defendant for cancellation, and the 2nd Defendant is to proceed to cancel the same and rectify the register accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT MALINDI
ELC CASE NO. 147 OF 2010
THE TOWN COUNCIL OF KILIFI....................................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
ISAAC JUMA OBILA T/A LAVINGTON MILK BAR...........1ST DEFENDANT
COMMISSIONER OF LANDS.............................................2ND DEFENDANT
ATTORNEY GENERAL........................................................3RD DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
1. In the Plaint dated 4th December, 2010, the Plaintiff averred that it is the custodian of all public utility plots in its jurisdiction; that some of the said utility plots are L.R Nos. 5054/771, 772 and 773 Kilifi Township and that the plots were later on registered as Kilifi Township Block 3/416, 417 and 418 respectively.
2. The Plaintiff has averred that parcel of land number 5054/771 was set aside for putting up a nursery school while the other plots were reserved for a Social Hall for public purposes.
3. It is the Plaintiff’s case that in collusion with the 1st Defendant, the 2nd Defendant issued to the 1st Defendant Leases and proceeded to issue Certificates of Leases on 14th May, 2010 for the suit property and that the grant of those Leases and issuance of the Certificates of Leases to the 1st Defendant was fraudulent and amounted to outright theft of public utility.
4. The Plaintiff is seeking for a declaration that the suit properties are public utility plots and for cancellation of the Certificates of Leases that were issued to the 1st Defendant. The Plaintiff is also seeking for a permanent injunction restraining the 1st Defendant from dealing with the suit properties in any manner whatsoever.
5. In his Defence, the 1st Defendant averred that he was lawfully issued with the Certificates of Leases in respect to the suit properties.
6. The 3rd Defendant denied the particulars of fraud pleaded in the Plaint.
7. Although the Defendants were served with the hearing notice, they did not attend court on 1st November, 2016 when the matter came up for hearing. The matter proceeded for hearing in their absence.
8. The then Town the Plaintiff PW1, informed the court that he received a complaint about the grabbing of the suit properties which were meant for public purposes and caused the current suit to be instituted.
9. According to PW1, Plot No. 771 was reserved for a Social Hall while plots No. 772 and 773 were meant for a nursery school.
10. PW1 informed the court that his investigations revealed that the 1st Defendant had been issued with letters of allotment for the three plots on 27th March, 1998 and that when he sought to know why the said letters of allotment had been issued to the 1st Defendant, the Commissioner of Lands informed him that they were forgeries. PW1 produced in evidence the alleged letters of allotment and the correspondences he had with the Commissioner of Lands.
11. PW1 also produced in evidence the purported Sale Agreement between the 1st Defendant and one Msalam Said Abdalla in which the 1st Defendant allegedly bought the three properties for Kshs. 500,000 per plot.
12. According to the letter dated 23rd March, 2010, the letters of Allotment dated 27th March, 1998 were all forgeries.
13. Considering that the Commissioner of Lands disowned the letters of Allotment dated 27th March, 1998, it follows that the Leases and the Certificates of Leases that were subsequently issued to the 1st Defendant should not have been issued.
14. The 1st Defendant did not rebutt the evidence of PW1 that indeed Plots Nos. 5054/771 (Kilifi Township/Block 3/416), 5054/772 (Kilifi Township/Block 3/417), and 5054/773 (Kilifi Township/Block 3/418) were reserved for public purpose.
15. In the circumstances, I find and hold that the Plaintiff has proved its case on a balance of probabilities.
16. For those reasons, I allow the Plaintiff’s Plaint dated 4th December, 2010 in the following terms;
a.A declaration be and is hereby issued that the parcels of land originally known as L.R. Nos. 5054/771, 5054/772 and 5054/773 and now registered as Kilifi/Township Block 3/416, Kilifi/Township Block 3/417 and Kilifi/Township block 3/418 are and do remain as public utility plots within the Plaintiff’s jurisdiction and that the grant of the Leases dated the 22nd day of April, 2010 and the subsequent issuance of the Certificates of Leases on the 14th day of May, 2010 to Isaac Juma Obila is fraudulent hence void ab initio.
b.An order be and is hereby issued directing the 1st Defendant herein to surrender and/or return the Leases and Certificates of Leases in his favour to the 2nd Defendant herein for cancellation thereof and that the 2nd Defendant notwithstanding the foregone to forthwith proceed to cancel the said Leases and the Certificates of Leases issued to the Plaintiff herein and to accordingly rectify the Register.
c.A permanent injunction be and is hereby issued against the 1st Defendant herein restraining him by himself and/or him servants, agents and/or employees whether each and/or all of the them or otherwise from in anyway whatsoever dealing with the suit property herein and/or claiming any interest into all and/or anyone of the said public utility plots and/or acting in any manner whatsoever detrimental and/or contrary to public interest and/or acting in any manner whatsoever with a view of defeating the Plaintiff’s interest in the parcels of land.
d.Costs of and incidentals to this suit to be paid by the 1st Defendant.
DATED AND SIGNEDATMACHAKOSTHIS2NDDAY OFMAY, 2017.
O. A. ANGOTE
JUDGE
DATED, DELIVEREDANDSIGNEDATMALINDITHIS12THDAY OFMAY, 2017.
J. O. OLOLA
JUDGE