[2017] KEELRC 190 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 190 (KLR)

The court found that the Respondent, Dock Workers Union, lacked a recognition agreement with the Claimant, Transeast [K] Ltd, and therefore had no legal standing to engage in industrial relations or call for industrial action against the Claimant. The redundancy process in question was conducted in accordance with...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 190 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Transeast [K] Ltd; Respondent: Dock Workers Union
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 939 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications
Outcome
Claimant's application granted; Respondent's application declined.
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Trade Union Recognition, Collective Bargaining Agreements, Redundancy Procedure, Industrial Action, Injunctive Relief
Source Language
english
Employment and Labour Trade Union Recognition Collective Bargaining Agreements Redundancy Procedure Industrial Action Injunctive Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Transeast [K] Ltd

Claimant

Dock Workers Union

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent, a trade union without a recognition agreement with the Claimant, can lawfully call for or instigate industrial action against the Claimant.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to injunctive relief restraining the Respondent from calling or instigating an unprotected strike.
  3. 3 Whether the Respondent is entitled to an order restraining the Claimant from issuing redundancy notices.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Respondent, Dock Workers Union, lacked a recognition agreement with the Claimant, Transeast [K] Ltd, and therefore had no legal standing to engage in industrial relations or call for industrial action against the Claimant. The redundancy process in question was conducted in accordance with the collective bargaining agreement between the Claimant and the recognized union, TAWU. The Respondent's concession and the legal framework under Section 54 of the Labour Relations Act 2007 supported the Claimant's application for injunctive relief. The Respondent's own application was declined due to lack of demonstrated capacity and absence of submissions.

Court Disposition

Claimant's application granted; Respondent's application declined.

Orders

  • The Claimant's application dated 17th December 2015 is granted.
  • The Respondent's application filed on 22nd December 2015 is declined.