[2021] KECA 358 (KLR)

[2021] KECA 358 (KLR)

The court found that the delay of about 5 days in filing the record of appeal was not inordinate and that the applicant had provided sufficient reasons for the delay, including the time taken to obtain proceedings. The court was satisfied that no prejudice would be occasioned to the respondent by granting the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KECA 358 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Transmara Sugar Company Limited; Respondent: Joseph Amolo Omolo
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application E122 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Process Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Transmara Sugar Company Limited

Appellant

Joseph Amolo Omolo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing the notice and record of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing was inordinate and if any prejudice would be occasioned to the respondent by granting the extension.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the delay of about 5 days in filing the record of appeal was not inordinate and that the applicant had provided sufficient reasons for the delay, including the time taken to obtain proceedings. The court was satisfied that no prejudice would be occasioned to the respondent by granting the extension. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules and allowed the application for extension of time to file and serve the notice of appeal and record of appeal out of time.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant shall file and serve the notice of appeal within seven days from the date of this ruling.
  • The applicant shall file the record of appeal within sixty days from the date the notice of appeal is filed.