[2017] KEELRC 1631 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1631 (KLR)

The court found that the cause of action for unfair termination and terminal benefits accrued in April 2011, as evidenced by the demand letter. Even if the date of the Certificate of Disagreement (6 September 2011) was considered, the claim was filed outside the three-year limitation period prescribed by section 90...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1631 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Transport Workers Union (K); Respondent: Scarce Commodities Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 259 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
claim dismissed as time-barred
Judges
MSA Makhandia
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Limitation Periods, Terminal Benefits, Conciliation Process
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Limitation Periods Terminal Benefits Conciliation Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Transport Workers Union (K)

Applicant

Scarce Commodities Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the claim for unfair termination and terminal benefits was time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the date of accrual of the cause of action was the date of termination or the date of the Certificate of Disagreement.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the cause of action for unfair termination and terminal benefits accrued in April 2011, as evidenced by the demand letter. Even if the date of the Certificate of Disagreement (6 September 2011) was considered, the claim was filed outside the three-year limitation period prescribed by section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007. Therefore, the claim was time-barred and could not be entertained by the court.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed as time-barred

Orders

  • The preliminary objection is upheld.
  • The Memorandum of Claim is dismissed.