[2013] KEHC 6652 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 6652 (KLR)

The court held that the respondent's application for release of the decretal sum was premature because the appeal was still pending before the court. The failure by the appellant to list the appeal for directions did not result in abatement or lapse of the appeal, as the Civil Procedure Rules do not provide for such...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 6652 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Tri-Clover Industries (K) Ltd; Respondent: Patrick Kitheka
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 589 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Release of Decretal Sum Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
DW Mbuteti
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeal Procedure, Release of Decretal Sum
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Appeal Procedure Release of Decretal Sum

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tri-Clover Industries (K) Ltd

Appellant

Patrick Kitheka

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Release of Decretal Sum Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the respondent is entitled to the release of the decretal sum deposited in court pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether failure by the appellant to list the appeal for directions amounts to abatement or lapse of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the respondent's application for release of the decretal sum was premature because the appeal was still pending before the court. The failure by the appellant to list the appeal for directions did not result in abatement or lapse of the appeal, as the Civil Procedure Rules do not provide for such a consequence. The proper remedy for delay in prosecuting an appeal is an application for dismissal for want of prosecution, which had not been made. Therefore, the respondent was not entitled to the release of the decretal sum at this stage.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The respondent's application for release of the decretal sum is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.