[2015] KEHC 5015 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 5015 (KLR)

The court found that neither party's submissions addressed pure issues of law as required for a valid preliminary objection. Instead, both sides raised matters that should have been canvassed during the substantive hearing of the Notice of Motion. Citing the principle from Mukisa Biscuits Co. v. West End...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 5015 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Translakers Limited; Applicant: Melech Eng. Construction Co.; Respondent: Andrew Momanyi & Another
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Miscellaneous 4 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed
Legal Topics
Preliminary Objection, Stay of Execution, Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Preliminary Objection Stay of Execution Leave to Appeal Out of Time

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Translakers Limited

Applicant

Melech Eng. Construction Co.

Applicant

Andrew Momanyi & Another

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the preliminary objection raised pure issues of law as required by law.
  2. 2 Whether the preliminary objection should be upheld or dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that neither party's submissions addressed pure issues of law as required for a valid preliminary objection. Instead, both sides raised matters that should have been canvassed during the substantive hearing of the Notice of Motion. Citing the principle from Mukisa Biscuits Co. v. West End Distributors, the court held that the preliminary objection did not meet the threshold for consideration and was therefore dismissed. The parties were directed to proceed with the substantive application.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed

Orders

  • The preliminary objection is dismissed.
  • Parties are directed to fix the Notice of Motion for hearing at the registry.