[2017] KECA 346 (KLR)

[2017] KECA 346 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent had complied with the procedural requirements for filing the appeal within time, as the period required for preparation of proceedings was properly excluded based on the certificate of delay. The omission to include a certified copy of the decree in the record of appeal, while not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KECA 346 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Truphosa Cheredi Mudembei; Applicant: Nevin Egesa Jedevera; Respondent: John K. Malembi
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal (Application) 81 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Strike Out Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
AM Githinji, GG Okwengu, A Mohammed
Legal Topics
Appeal Timelines, Certificate of Delay, Record of Appeal Requirements, Supplementary Record, Substantive Justice, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Appeal Timelines Certificate of Delay Record of Appeal Requirements Supplementary Record Substantive Justice Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Truphosa Cheredi Mudembei

Applicant

Nevin Egesa Jedevera

Applicant

John K. Malembi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application to Strike Out Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appeal was filed out of time contrary to Rule 82(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules.
  2. 2 Whether omission to include a certified copy of the decree in the record of appeal is fatal to the appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent should be allowed to file a supplementary record of appeal to introduce the decree.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent had complied with the procedural requirements for filing the appeal within time, as the period required for preparation of proceedings was properly excluded based on the certificate of delay. The omission to include a certified copy of the decree in the record of appeal, while not condoned, was not fatal to the appeal and could be remedied by filing a supplementary record. The court emphasized the need to administer substantive justice rather than dispose of matters on technicalities, particularly given the emotive nature of the underlying land dispute. Consequently, the application to strike out the appeal was dismissed, and the respondent was granted...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The applicant's motion to strike out the appeal is dismissed.
  • The respondent is directed to file a supplementary record of appeal introducing the decree within 7 days from the date hereof.