[2017] KEHC 6656 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 6656 (KLR)

The court found that the application dated 26th August 2013 for reinstatement of the suit had already been heard and dismissed by Havelock J. on 4th November 2013 due to non-appearance by the plaintiff. As such, the application is spent and there is nothing further for the court to determine on that application. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 6656 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Trust Bank Limited (In liquidation); Defendant: Aces High Limited; Defendant: Nagib Jafferali Popat; Defendant: Shelina Popat Lanoe
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 2060 of 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement
Outcome
Application found to be spent; no further orders on the application.
Judges
F Tuiyott
Legal Topics
Dismissal of Suit, Reinstatement of Suit, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Dismissal of Suit Reinstatement of Suit Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Trust Bank Limited (In liquidation)

Plaintiff

Aces High Limited

Defendant

Nagib Jafferali Popat

Defendant

Shelina Popat Lanoe

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement

  1. 1 Whether the application dated 26th August 2013 for reinstatement of the suit had already been determined.
  2. 2 Whether the current application is spent in light of the previous court order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application dated 26th August 2013 for reinstatement of the suit had already been heard and dismissed by Havelock J. on 4th November 2013 due to non-appearance by the plaintiff. As such, the application is spent and there is nothing further for the court to determine on that application. The parties were advised to consider the way forward in light of this procedural history.

Court Disposition

Application found to be spent; no further orders on the application.

Orders

  • The application dated 26th August 2013 is spent, having been dismissed on 4th November 2013.
  • Parties to consider the way forward.