[2008] KEHC 2690 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's attempt to seek leave to commence proper appeal proceedings, while a notice of appeal and record of appeal filed without leave remain on record, constitutes an abuse of the court process. The court held that the applicant should have either sought leave to deem the already...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 2690 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kirtesh Premchand Shah; Respondent: Trust Bank Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 413 of 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Chamber Summons / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed as abuse of court process
- Judges
- GG Okwengu
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Liquidation Proceedings, Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kirtesh Premchand Shah
Applicant
Trust Bank Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Chamber Summons / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant can seek leave to commence proper appeal proceedings when a notice of appeal and record of appeal have already been filed without leave.
- 2 Whether the application for leave constitutes an abuse of the court process in the circumstances of the case.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's attempt to seek leave to commence proper appeal proceedings, while a notice of appeal and record of appeal filed without leave remain on record, constitutes an abuse of the court process. The court held that the applicant should have either sought leave to deem the already instituted proceedings as properly filed or withdrawn the irregularly filed notice of appeal before seeking fresh leave. Since the appeal proceedings are now within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal, any order to regularize the appeal can only be granted by that court. Accordingly, the application before the High Court was dismissed as an abuse of process.
Court Disposition
application dismissed as abuse of court process
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- No leave granted to commence appeal proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS)
Civil Case 413 of 1997
TRUST BANK LTD ………………….…………………… RESPONDENT
VERSUS
KIRTESH PREMCHAND SHAH ………..………..…..……. APPLICANT
RULING
By a Chamber Summons dated 17th December, 2007, brought under Section 35 of the Banking Act, Sections 228 and 241 of the Companies Act and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, Kirtesh Premchand Shah (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant), has come to this court seeking leave to commence proper appeal proceedings against the judgment of this court delivered on the 25th January, 2006. The suit was originally filed by the Respondent Trust Bank Ltd against the Applicant & 4 Others but the suit against the 4 others was withdrawn. In the course of the trial, the Plaintiff company was placed under liquidation but the suit against the applicant proceeded by virtue of leave granted by the court on 3rd October, 2001 under Section 228 and 241(c) of the Companies Act. Being dissatisfied with the judgment delivered against him, the Applicant filed a Notice of appeal. The Applicant also filed an application in the Court of Appeal for stay of execution pending appeal.
The Advocate for the Respondent successfully raised an objection to the application for stay of execution, pending the intended appeal on the grounds that, the Applicant had not sought leave of the Court to bring the proceedings. The Applicant has now come to this Court seeking leave of this Court to commence proper appeal proceedings against the judgment of the High Court.
The Respondent has filed grounds of opposition contending that the Applicant having filed a notice of appeal and a record of appeal before the Court of Appeal, the application before the court is an abuse of the court process as no leave has been sought by the Applicant to institute the appeal. It was contended that the appeal filed by the Applicant remains on record and there was no proper basis for granting the orders sought.
I have considered the application, the affidavit in support, the annextures thereto, the grounds of opposition and the submissions of counsels. It is clear to me that the Respondent having been placed under liquidation, no action or proceedings can proceed against it without leave of the court. Indeed that was the basis upon which the Court of Appeal dismissed the Applicant’s motion dated 17th July, 2006, seeking an order for stay of execution pending appeal. The difficulty here appears to be that the Applicant is seeking leave to commence proper appeal proceedings when the proceedings which were filed without leave still remain on record.
I concur with the advocate for the Respondent that that is an abuse of the court process. Without withdrawing the notice of appeal which was irregularly filed, the applicant cannot request the court for leave to file another appeal. At best, the Applicant could only have sought an order for leave and an order to deem the proceedings already instituted as properly filed. However, the appeal proceedings are now within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal and such an order can only be granted by the Court of Appeal.
I therefore, find that this application is an abuse of the court process. Accordingly the same is dismissed.
Orders accordingly.
Dated, signed and delivered on this 12th day of March, 2008
H. M. OKWENGU
JUDGE