[2019] KEELC 2039 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 2039 (KLR)

The court found that the suit land was acquired by Chebet Barmala and registered in the defendant's name due to traditional discrimination against women, but with the intention that the defendant would hold the land in trust for the family. The plaintiffs and their respective houses had been in possession and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 2039 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Tula Chebet; Plaintiff: Michael Limo Ruto; Defendant: Thomas Kibet alias Ruto Chebet
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 52 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiffs' claim allowed; trust declared and orders for subdivision and transfer granted.
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Customary Trusts, Beneficial Ownership, Land Registration, Succession and Inheritance
Source Language
en
Land and Property Customary Trusts Beneficial Ownership Land Registration Succession and Inheritance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tula Chebet

Plaintiff

Michael Limo Ruto

Plaintiff

Thomas Kibet alias Ruto Chebet

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant holds the suit land in trust for the plaintiffs as beneficiaries of the estate of Chebet Barmala.
  2. 2 Whether the trust should be brought to an end and the land subdivided among the parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the suit land was acquired by Chebet Barmala and registered in the defendant's name due to traditional discrimination against women, but with the intention that the defendant would hold the land in trust for the family. The plaintiffs and their respective houses had been in possession and occupation of their portions of the land, evidencing their beneficial interest. The court held that a trust existed in favour of the plaintiffs and that the defendant was holding the land as trustee. The trust should be brought to an end by subdividing the land into three portions corresponding to the shares of the plaintiffs and the defendant, and new title deeds should be issued...

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' claim allowed; trust declared and orders for subdivision and transfer granted.

Orders

  • Declaration that the defendant holds 3.93 hectares of land in Moiben/Kimnai/723 on trust for the 1st plaintiff.
  • Declaration that the defendant holds 3.93 hectares of land in Moiben/Kimnai/723 on trust for the 2nd plaintiff.