[2024] KEHC 2473 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 2473 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent's application to set aside the arbitral award was filed outside the statutory three-month limitation period prescribed by Section 35(3) of the Arbitration Act. The award was released to the parties on 5th July 2019, but the respondent's application was filed on 23rd September...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 2473 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Tulsi Construction Limited; Respondent: Kenwood Property Developers Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application E334 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Applications for Recognition/enforcement and Setting Aside of Arbitral Award
Outcome
application for recognition and enforcement of arbitral award allowed; application to set aside dismissed
Judges
FG Mugambi
Legal Topics
Arbitral Award Enforcement, Setting Aside Award, Contractual Disputes, Limitation Periods, Construction Contracts
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Alternative Dispute Resolution Arbitral Award Enforcement Setting Aside Award Contractual Disputes Limitation Periods Construction Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tulsi Construction Limited

Applicant

Kenwood Property Developers Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Applications for Recognition/enforcement and Setting Aside of Arbitral Award

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's application to set aside the arbitral award was filed within the statutory limitation period.
  2. 2 Whether the arbitral award should be recognized and enforced as a judgment of the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent's application to set aside the arbitral award was filed outside the statutory three-month limitation period prescribed by Section 35(3) of the Arbitration Act. The award was released to the parties on 5th July 2019, but the respondent's application was filed on 23rd September 2019, well beyond the permissible period. As a result, the application to set aside was dismissed. The court further held that the applicant had complied with all requirements for recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award under Section 36 of the Arbitration Act, including providing certified copies of the contract and the award. In the absence of any opposition or valid...

Court Disposition

application for recognition and enforcement of arbitral award allowed; application to set aside dismissed

Orders

  • The final award prepared by Mr. Stanley Kebathi dated 1st March, 2019 is recognized and adopted as a judgment of this court.
  • The claimant is granted leave to enforce the award as a decree of this court.