[2025] KECA 916 (KLR)
The Court found that the respondent failed to serve the notice of appeal or file a record of appeal within the time prescribed by the Court of Appeal Rules. This failure was not controverted or explained by the respondent, who also failed to appear or respond to the application. The Court concluded that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KECA 916 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Tusker Mattresses; Respondent: Joseph Mwangi Gachoka
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal (Application) E068 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed; notice of appeal struck out with costs to the applicant
- Judges
- MA Warsame, JM Mativo, PM Gachoka
- Legal Topics
- Notice of Appeal, Service of Process, Striking Out Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tusker Mattresses
Applicant
Joseph Mwangi Gachoka
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent failed to serve the notice of appeal within the prescribed 7 days as required by the Court of Appeal Rules.
- 2 Whether failure to serve the notice of appeal or file a record of appeal within time warrants striking out the notice of appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the respondent failed to serve the notice of appeal or file a record of appeal within the time prescribed by the Court of Appeal Rules. This failure was not controverted or explained by the respondent, who also failed to appear or respond to the application. The Court concluded that the respondent had lost interest in pursuing the appeal and that the applicant was justified in seeking to strike out the notice of appeal. Consequently, the Court exercised its discretion to strike out the notice of appeal with costs to the applicant.
Court Disposition
application allowed; notice of appeal struck out with costs to the applicant
Orders
- The notice of appeal dated 23rd July 2021 is struck out.
- Costs awarded to the applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Tusker Mattresses v Gachoka (Civil Appeal (Application) E068 of 2021) [2025] KECA 916 (KLR) (26 May 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KECA 916 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Civil Appeal (Application) E068 of 2021
MA Warsame, JM Mativo & PM Gachoka, JJA
May 26, 2025
Between
Tusker Mattresses
Applicant
and
Joseph Mwangi Gachoka
Respondent
(Being an application to strike out a notice of appeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Naivasha (R. Mwongo, J.) dated 12th July 2021 in CA No. 38 of 2018 Civil Appeal 38 of 2018 )
Ruling
1. By a notice of motion dated 15th October 2021, under rules 77, 84 & 85 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022, the applicant is seeking to strike out a notice of appeal dated 23rd July 2021 on the ground that the respondent did not serve the notice within 7 days as set out in the rules.
2. The application is supported by the supporting affidavit of Mercy C. Kirui sworn on 15th October 2021. The respondent has not filed any response. When the application was called out for hearing M/s Soi, learned counsel was present for the applicant and there was no appearance by the respondent, though duly served.
3. We have considered the application and the submissions by the applicant. We note that the notice of appeal was filed 23rd July 2021 and the applicant states that to date, it has not been served with the notice of appeal or the record of appeal. This fact has not been controverted by the respondent. Therefore, it is clear that the respondent has failed to serve the notice of appeal or file a record of appeal within time and has not shown any interest in pursuing the same. Therefore, it is clear that the appellant has lost interest in pursuing the appeal and the applicant is justified, rightly so, in prosecuting the application before us.
4. This is a proper case in which the notice of appeal should be struck out. Accordingly, the notice of appeal is hereby struck out with costs to the applicant.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY, 2025. M. WARSAME.............................JUDGE OF APPEALJ. MATIVO.............................JUDGE OF APPEALM. GACHOKA C.Arb, FCIArb.............................JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a true copy of the original.Signed.DEPUTY REGISTRAR.