[2019] KEHC 3832 (KLR)
The court found that there had been a material change in circumstances since the original orders were made, specifically that the respondent had been transferred to a different hospital for ongoing treatment. The original orders, which restricted payment of hospital bills to a named hospital, were now unduly...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 3832 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: TWM; Applicant: JKM; Respondent: WN
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 97 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Vary Guardianship and Management Orders
- Outcome
- application allowed; previous orders varied to permit broader use of funds for respondent's welfare
- Legal Topics
- Mental Capacity, Guardianship of Adults, Management of Estate, Variation of Court Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TWM
Applicant
JKM
Applicant
WN
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Vary Guardianship and Management Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should vary its previous orders restricting payment of hospital bills to a specific hospital only.
- 2 Whether the applicants should be authorized to access and utilize the respondent's funds for broader medical and related expenses.
- 3 Whether the applicants remain suitable as guardians and managers of the respondent's estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there had been a material change in circumstances since the original orders were made, specifically that the respondent had been transferred to a different hospital for ongoing treatment. The original orders, which restricted payment of hospital bills to a named hospital, were now unduly restrictive and prevented the applicants from meeting the respondent's medical and related expenses. The court held that it was in the best interests of the respondent to vary the orders to allow the applicants, as appointed guardians and managers, to access and utilize the respondent's funds for payment of hospital bills and other necessary expenses. The court also confirmed the...
Court Disposition
application allowed; previous orders varied to permit broader use of funds for respondent's welfare
Orders
- The subject WN is adjudged as a person incapacitated and incapable of making her own decisions.
- TWM and JKM are appointed as guardians and managers of the estate of WN.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
35 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
FAMILY DIVISION
MISC. APP. NO. 97 OF 2019
TWM..................................................................1STAPPLICANT
JKM................................................................ 2ND APPLICANT
VERSUS
WN.....................................................PATIENT/RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Application coming for consideration in this Ruling is the one dated 2. 9.2019 seeking to vary the orders of this Court issued on 20. 6.2019 in the following terms:
i. THAT the Subject WN be and is hereby adjudged as a person incapacitated and incapable of making her own decisions.
ii. THAT the Applicants TWM and JKM be and are hereby appointed as guardians and managers of the Estate of the subject WN.
iii. THAT the Petitioners TWM and JKM be and are hereby authorized to access, transact, operate, withdraw and utilize the funds held by the subject in two bank accounts No. [xxxx] (Transitional Account) and [xxxx] (Fixed Deposit Account) held with Co-operative Bank at Karatina Branch in the name of the subject WN.
iv. The funds to be paid to MERIDIAN EQUATOR HOSPITAL to clear the Hospital Bill.
2. The Application is supported by Affidavit of TWM and JKM in which they have deposed that the orders gave specific orders to pay funds to Meridian Equator Hospital to clear the Hospital Bill.
3. They further deposed that there has been change of circumstances as the patient has now been transferred to Kenyatta National Hospital to continue with treatment.
4. The Applicants are now seeking to have the orders set aside as they have restricted, prevented, and stopped them from catering the medical expenses of the patient and further, the said orders have restricted the bank from releasing funds to Kenyatta National Hospital.
5. The Applicants also said they had borrowed funds from third parties, which they are required to repay. They filed an affidavit when attached evidence of transaction with third parties. I have considered the Affidavit in support of the Application dated 2. 9.2019 together with the documents in support of the said Applicant. I find the consent of all the family was obtained.
6. Section 2 of the Mental Health Act defines "person suffering from mental disorder" as follows” means a person who has been found to be so suffering under this Act and includes a person diagnosed as a psychopathic person with mental illness and person suffering from mental impairment due to alcohol or substance abuse."
7. Part XII of the Mental Health Act provides for judicial power over persons and estates of persons suffering from mental disorder. The said section provides as follows:-
26. Order for custody, management, and guardianship
(1) The court may make orders—
(a) For the management of the estate of any person suffering from mental disorder; and
(b) For the guardianship of any person suffering from mental disorder by any near relative or by any other suitable person.
(2) Where there is no known relative or other suitable person, the court may order that the Public Trustee be appointed manager of the estate and guardian of any such person.
(3) Whereupon inquiry it is found that the person to whom the inquiry relates is suffering from mental disorder to such an extent as to be incapable of managing his affairs, but that he is capable of managing himself and is not dangerous to himself or to others or likely to act in a manner offensive to public decency, the court may make such orders as it may think fit for the management of the estate of such person, including proper provision for his maintenance and for the maintenance of such members of his family as are dependent upon him for maintenance, but need not, in such case, make any order as to the custody of the person suffering from mental disorder.
8. In view of the changed circumstances of this case the orders of this court are reviewed as follows;
i. THAT the Subject WN be and is hereby adjudged as a person incapacitated and incapable of making her own decisions.
ii. THAT the Applicants TWM and JKM be and are hereby appointed as guardians and managers of the Estate of the subject.
iii. THAT the Petitioners TWM and JKM be and are hereby authorized to access, transact, operate, withdraw and utilize the funds held by the subject in two bank accounts No. [xxxx] (Transitional Account) and [xxxx] (Fixed Deposit Account) held with Co-operative Bank at Karatina Branch in the name of the subject WN to pay hospital bills and to meet other expenses in respect of the subject.
iv. THAT the Costs to be paid by the Petitioner/Applicants
DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED IN OPEN COURT THIS 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER,2019.
ASENATH ONGERI
JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA, NAIROBI.