[2022] KEHC 12270 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 12270 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had satisfied all statutory requirements for recognition and enforcement of the Additional Arbitral Award on costs. The application was unopposed, and there was no evidence of any objection, appeal, or application to set aside the award under the grounds provided by Section 37(1)...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 12270 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Ujenzi Bora Investment Limited; Respondent: Africa Forest Lodges Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 266 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award
Outcome
application allowed; additional arbitral award recognized and adopted as order of the court; leave granted to enforce award; each party to bear own costs
Judges
A Mshila
Legal Topics
Arbitral Award Enforcement, Recognition of Awards, Arbitration Costs, Unopposed Applications
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Alternative Dispute Resolution Arbitral Award Enforcement Recognition of Awards Arbitration Costs Unopposed Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ujenzi Bora Investment Limited

Claimant

Africa Forest Lodges Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has made out a case for recognition, adoption, and enforcement of the Additional Arbitral Award as a judgment of the court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had satisfied all statutory requirements for recognition and enforcement of the Additional Arbitral Award on costs. The application was unopposed, and there was no evidence of any objection, appeal, or application to set aside the award under the grounds provided by Section 37(1) of the Arbitration Act. The applicant presented a certified copy of the Additional Award and the relevant decree, complying with Section 36(3) of the Act. The court was satisfied that there were no anomalies or legal impediments to recognizing and adopting the Additional Award as a judgment of the court. Accordingly, the application was allowed, and the applicant was granted...

Court Disposition

application allowed; additional arbitral award recognized and adopted as order of the court; leave granted to enforce award; each party to bear own costs

Orders

  • The Additional Arbitral Award on costs dated 5/10/2018 delivered by Sylvia Mueni Kasanga MCIArb, the Arbitrator, is recognized and adopted as an order of this Honourable Court.
  • The applicant is granted leave to enforce the Additional Arbitral Award dated 5/10/2018 as an order of the court.