[2020] KEHC 2143 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 2143 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had provided plausible grounds for their delay in filing the appeal, specifically the lack of notice of the judgment and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on their ability to instruct counsel. The absence of opposition from the respondents further supported the application....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 2143 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: United Millers Limited; Applicant: Dennis Cheruiyot Bett; Respondent: Silali Joseph Juma; Respondent: Richard Barasa Wambacha
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 18 & 19 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
HK Chemitei
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Extension of Time, Unopposed Application
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Extension of Time Unopposed Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

United Millers Limited

Applicant

Dennis Cheruiyot Bett

Applicant

Silali Joseph Juma

Respondent

Richard Barasa Wambacha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against the judgment of the lower court.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants have provided sufficient reasons for the delay in filing the appeal.
  3. 3 Whether a stay of execution should be granted pending the intended appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had provided plausible grounds for their delay in filing the appeal, specifically the lack of notice of the judgment and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on their ability to instruct counsel. The absence of opposition from the respondents further supported the application. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application, granting the applicants leave to file their appeal out of time and ordering a stay of execution pending the determination of the appeal, subject to compliance with the filing timeline.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Applicants granted 14 days from the date of the ruling to file their appeal.
  • Stay of execution against the applicants pending determination of the appeal.