[2020] KEELRC 1293 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 1293 (KLR)

The court held that the claimants, having been wrongfully terminated and subsequently reinstated by the judgment of 10/9/2009, were entitled to back pay and all employment benefits from the date of their respective suspensions up to the date of judgment. The court rejected the claimants' computations that extended...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELRC 1293 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: University Academic Staff Union; Applicant: Lucy Mugwere; Applicant: Elizabeth Atieno Menya & Androniko Otedo Menya (Administrators of the Estate of Joel Menya Otendo); Respondent: Kenyatta University
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 160 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Post Judgment Computation of Terminal Dues
Outcome
claimants awarded back pay and benefits up to judgment date, subject to statutory deductions; respondent to pay costs and interest
Judges
HS Wasilwa
Legal Topics
Terminal Benefits, Collective Bargaining Agreements, Wrongful Termination, Reinstatement, Salary Arrears, Pension Entitlements
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Terminal Benefits Collective Bargaining Agreements Wrongful Termination Reinstatement Salary Arrears Pension Entitlements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

University Academic Staff Union

Applicant

Lucy Mugwere

Applicant

Elizabeth Atieno Menya & Androniko Otedo Menya (Administrators of the Estate of Joel Menya Otendo)

Applicant

Kenyatta University

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Post Judgment Computation of Terminal Dues

  1. 1 Whether the claimants are entitled to back pay and terminal dues from the date of suspension to the date of judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the computation of dues should extend beyond the date of judgment.
  3. 3 What specific amounts are payable to the 2nd and 3rd claimants as a result of the court's reinstatement order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the claimants, having been wrongfully terminated and subsequently reinstated by the judgment of 10/9/2009, were entitled to back pay and all employment benefits from the date of their respective suspensions up to the date of judgment. The court rejected the claimants' computations that extended beyond the judgment date, emphasizing that the prior judgment did not award any sums beyond that point. The court accepted the claimants' computations for the relevant period, subject to statutory deductions, and ordered the respondent to pay the specified amounts. The respondent's failure to file its own computation or contest the figures presented by the claimants was noted....

Court Disposition

claimants awarded back pay and benefits up to judgment date, subject to statutory deductions; respondent to pay costs and interest

Orders

  • Respondent to pay 2nd Claimant (Lucy Mugwere) Kshs. 4,797,190.69 less statutory deductions.
  • Respondent to pay 3rd Claimants (estate of Joel Menya Otendo) Kshs. 4,856,909 less statutory deductions.