[2023] KEELC 17963 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 17963 (KLR)

The court granted the plaintiff's request to withdraw the suit as there was no opposition from the defendants. Applying section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act, the court held that costs follow the event. Since the defendants had participated in the proceedings by filing notices of appointment and responding to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 17963 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Uptown Agencies Limited; Defendant: Kiambu County Government; Defendant: Kahawa Sukari Residents & Plot Owners Welfare Association (Represented Samuel Mwaniki Waithaka, Edward Kiganjo, Michael Mwiti & Joseph Kariuki)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Thika
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 2 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Withdrawal and Costs
Outcome
Suit withdrawn; costs awarded to defendants.
Judges
BM Eboso
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Suit, Costs Award, Taxation of Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Withdrawal of Suit Costs Award Taxation of Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Uptown Agencies Limited

Plaintiff

Kiambu County Government

Defendant

Kahawa Sukari Residents & Plot Owners Welfare Association (Represented Samuel Mwaniki Waithaka, Edward Kiganjo, Michael Mwiti & Joseph Kariuki)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Withdrawal and Costs

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff's application to withdraw the suit should be granted.
  2. 2 Who should bear the costs of the withdrawn suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court granted the plaintiff's request to withdraw the suit as there was no opposition from the defendants. Applying section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act, the court held that costs follow the event. Since the defendants had participated in the proceedings by filing notices of appointment and responding to the application, they were entitled to costs. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the suit, with the quantum to be agreed upon by the parties or, in default, to be taxed by the court's taxing officer.

Court Disposition

Suit withdrawn; costs awarded to defendants.

Orders

  • The suit is marked as withdrawn.
  • The plaintiff shall bear the costs of the suit.