[2022] KEELC 15656 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 15656 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant was entitled to withdraw the appeal under Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010. However, considering the respondents' position and the applicable statutory provisions, the court exercised its discretion to order that the appellant bear half the costs of the appeal, to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 15656 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Inviolata Lucy Ura; Respondent: Harrison Nyariere Okello (Sued as the Representative of the Estate of Rubot Okello Ogwange); Respondent: The Land Registrar, Homabay; Respondent: The Honourable Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 21 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Withdrawal of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal withdrawn; appellant to bear half the costs and interest.
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Appeal, Costs Award, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Withdrawal of Appeal Costs Award Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Inviolata Lucy Ura

Appellant

Harrison Nyariere Okello (Sued as the Representative of the Estate of Rubot Okello Ogwange)

Respondent

The Land Registrar, Homabay

Respondent

The Honourable Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Withdrawal of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to withdraw the appeal under Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010.
  2. 2 Who should bear the costs of the withdrawn appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant was entitled to withdraw the appeal under Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010. However, considering the respondents' position and the applicable statutory provisions, the court exercised its discretion to order that the appellant bear half the costs of the appeal, to be taxed by the taxing master, together with interest at court rates from the date of the ruling. The withdrawal was thus allowed, but the appellant was not absolved from partial liability for costs, balancing the interests of justice and fairness to both parties.

Court Disposition

Appeal withdrawn; appellant to bear half the costs and interest.

Orders

  • This appeal is hereby marked as withdrawn.
  • The appellant to bear half (1/2) costs of the appeal to be taxed by the taxing master of this court together with interest at court rates from this date.