[2021] KEHC 6715 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 6715 (KLR)

The court found that the appeal was not ripe for dismissal for want of prosecution because directions had not yet been given and the lower court file, as well as certified copies of the proceedings and judgment, had not been availed to the High Court. The respondent had demonstrated efforts to obtain the necessary...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 6715 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Uzuri Foods Limited (Elliots Bread Division); Respondent: Joseph Mugo Mwangi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 588 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
motion struck out as premature
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeals Process, Directions in Appeals
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Appeals Process Directions in Appeals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Uzuri Foods Limited (Elliots Bread Division)

Appellant

Joseph Mugo Mwangi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the appeal is ripe for dismissal for want of prosecution under the Civil Procedure Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant/respondent has taken reasonable steps to prosecute the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appeal was not ripe for dismissal for want of prosecution because directions had not yet been given and the lower court file, as well as certified copies of the proceedings and judgment, had not been availed to the High Court. The respondent had demonstrated efforts to obtain the necessary documents from the lower court, and the delay was not solely attributable to the respondent. The application for dismissal was therefore premature. The court struck out the motion and issued specific directions to facilitate the progress of the appeal, including orders for the Executive Officer to provide the required documents and for the parties to take further steps once the...

Court Disposition

motion struck out as premature

Orders

  • The Executive Officer (Chief Magistrate’s Court-Milimani Commercial Courts) shall avail certified copies of the typed proceedings, judgment delivered on 24th August, 2016 and decree in CMCC NO. 85 of 2008 to the appellant/respondent within 20 days from this day.
  • The appellant/respondent shall thereafter compile, file and serve its record of appeal within 14 days from the date of receipt of the aforementioned documents.