[2024] KEELC 7118 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 7118 (KLR)

The court found that the relationship between advocate and client is contractual and subject to the Limitation of Actions Act. However, there was no evidence that the retainer between the parties had been terminated in 2009, nor that the bill of costs was filed outside the limitation period. The court relied on...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 7118 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: V Chokaa & Co Advocates; Respondent: County Government of Mombasa
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E078 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs and Preliminary Objection
Outcome
Application allowed; preliminary objection dismissed; judgment entered for applicant as prayed.
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Advocate Client Costs, Limitation of Actions, Taxation of Costs, Retainer Agreements
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Advocate Client Costs Limitation of Actions Taxation of Costs Retainer Agreements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

V Chokaa & Co Advocates

Applicant

County Government of Mombasa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs and Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the advocate-client bill of costs is statute barred under the Limitation of Actions Act.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs in accordance with the certificate of taxation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the relationship between advocate and client is contractual and subject to the Limitation of Actions Act. However, there was no evidence that the retainer between the parties had been terminated in 2009, nor that the bill of costs was filed outside the limitation period. The court relied on correspondence between the parties after 2009 and previous similar matters to conclude that the claim was not time barred. Consequently, the respondent's preliminary objection was dismissed, and the applicant's request for judgment on the taxed costs was granted as prayed, as the taxed costs had not been set aside or altered and the applicant was entitled to judgment under section...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; preliminary objection dismissed; judgment entered for applicant as prayed.

Orders

  • Judgment is entered for the applicant against the respondent in the sum of Kshs. 33,013.92 in accordance with the certificate of taxation.
  • The respondent shall pay the applicant the sum of Kshs. 33,013.92 together with interest at 14% per annum from 17th November 2022 until payment in full.