[2020] KEHC 395 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 395 (KLR)

The court found that there was a valid and enforceable agreement between the parties, containing an arbitration clause that covered the present dispute. The plaintiff's suit was premised on an alleged breach of this agreement. Since the plaintiff did not oppose the application and there was no evidence that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 395 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Vaghjiyani Enterprises Limited; Defendant: Prilscot Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case E462 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Stay and Referral to Arbitration
Outcome
Application allowed; proceedings stayed and matter referred to arbitration; costs awarded to defendant/applicant.
Judges
JV Juma
Legal Topics
Arbitration Clauses, Stay of Proceedings, Contractual Disputes
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Arbitration Clauses Stay of Proceedings Contractual Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vaghjiyani Enterprises Limited

Plaintiff

Prilscot Company Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Stay and Referral to Arbitration

  1. 1 Whether the dispute should be referred to arbitration in light of the arbitration clause in the contract.
  2. 2 Whether the court should stay proceedings pending arbitration.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was a valid and enforceable agreement between the parties, containing an arbitration clause that covered the present dispute. The plaintiff's suit was premised on an alleged breach of this agreement. Since the plaintiff did not oppose the application and there was no evidence that the arbitration agreement was null, void, inoperative, or incapable of being performed, or that there was no dispute to refer, the court was bound by Section 6 of the Arbitration Act to stay the proceedings and refer the matter to arbitration. The court emphasized that parties are bound by the terms of their contract, including the arbitration clause, and that the court will not...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; proceedings stayed and matter referred to arbitration; costs awarded to defendant/applicant.

Orders

  • All further proceedings herein are stayed and the matter is referred to arbitration.
  • The Plaintiff/Respondent shall pay the costs of the application.