[2018] KEELC 3591 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3591 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff company remains the registered proprietor of the suit land, and the Defendants have not established any legal interest in the property. The Applicant's locus standi was upheld, as there was insufficient evidence to show she was not a director at the time of filing. The absence of a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 3591 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Valeo Building and Civil Engineering Limited; Defendant: Bernard Bosire; Defendant: Lazarus Kivuva
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 267 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Outcome
Application allowed; temporary injunction granted.
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Company Locus Standi, Land Ownership Disputes, Directorship Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Interlocutory Injunctions Company Locus Standi Land Ownership Disputes Directorship Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Valeo Building and Civil Engineering Limited

Plaintiff

Bernard Bosire

Defendant

Lazarus Kivuva

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the Defendants from interfering with Land Reference Number 20323 pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the Applicant had locus standi to institute the suit and swear affidavits on behalf of the Plaintiff company.
  3. 3 Whether the absence of a board resolution invalidates the suit or application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff company remains the registered proprietor of the suit land, and the Defendants have not established any legal interest in the property. The Applicant's locus standi was upheld, as there was insufficient evidence to show she was not a director at the time of filing. The absence of a board resolution was not fatal, following the principle that any authorized director may institute proceedings unless the contrary is shown. The Plaintiff established a prima facie case for an injunction, as the Defendants' actions threatened the Plaintiff's proprietary rights. Accordingly, the application for a temporary injunction was allowed as prayed.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; temporary injunction granted.

Orders

  • A temporary injunction is issued restraining the Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, family members, relatives, or anyone claiming under them from remaining, occupying, entering into, constructing any structure, transferring, selling, allocating, encumbering, dealing with or interfering with Land...
  • The officer commanding Mlolongo Police Station to enforce this order and ensure law and order is maintained.