[2018] KEHC 674 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 674 (KLR)

The court found that the application was filed without undue delay and that the applicant had demonstrated a risk of substantial loss if the decretal sum was paid before the appeal was heard. The applicant's willingness to provide security for due performance further satisfied the requirements for granting a stay of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 674 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Varomatech Enterprises; Respondent: Haron Nganga Ngunjiri
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 108 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Stay of Execution
Outcome
application allowed with conditions
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Stay of Execution, Security for Due Performance
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Stay of Execution Security for Due Performance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Varomatech Enterprises

Applicant

Haron Nganga Ngunjiri

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against the lower court judgment.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution of the lower court judgment should be granted pending appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant should provide security for due performance of the decree.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application was filed without undue delay and that the applicant had demonstrated a risk of substantial loss if the decretal sum was paid before the appeal was heard. The applicant's willingness to provide security for due performance further satisfied the requirements for granting a stay of execution. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave to file the appeal out of time and ordered a stay of execution on condition that the entire decretal sum be deposited in an interest-earning account in the joint names of the advocates within 30 days.

Court Disposition

application allowed with conditions

Orders

  • Leave to file the appeal is granted.
  • Stay of execution of the lower court judgment is granted, provided the applicant deposits the entire decretal sum in an interest-earning account in the joint names of the advocates on record within 30 days.