[2015] KEHC 3853 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 3853 (KLR)

The court found that the defendant admitted to using and ploughing the land in question despite a clear injunction order prohibiting such actions. The court emphasized that obedience to court orders is fundamental to the rule of law and that any party aggrieved by an order must seek redress through proper legal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 3853 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Veronicah Kimoi Kimitei; Defendant: Barnard K Kemboi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 64 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application / Ruling on Application for Contempt of Court
Outcome
Application for contempt allowed. Defendant committed to civil jail for six months unless he purges his contempt.
Judges
MA Silau
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Injunction Orders, Enforcement of Court Orders, Land Possession Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Contempt of Court Injunction Orders Enforcement of Court Orders Land Possession Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Veronicah Kimoi Kimitei

Plaintiff

Barnard K Kemboi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Contempt Application / Ruling on Application for Contempt of Court

  1. 1 Whether the defendant disobeyed the court's order of injunction.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant should be punished for contempt of court for disobeying the injunction order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant admitted to using and ploughing the land in question despite a clear injunction order prohibiting such actions. The court emphasized that obedience to court orders is fundamental to the rule of law and that any party aggrieved by an order must seek redress through proper legal channels rather than resorting to self-help or disobedience. The defendant's lack of remorse and failure to demonstrate willingness to comply with the order further justified the imposition of a custodial sentence. Accordingly, the court exercised its authority under Order 40 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules to punish the defendant for contempt by ordering his detention for six...

Court Disposition

Application for contempt allowed. Defendant committed to civil jail for six months unless he purges his contempt.

Orders

  • The defendant/respondent is ordered to be detained for six months unless he purges his contempt.
  • The defendant/respondent to be escorted to the cells to commence his term as ordered.