[2018] KEHC 7974 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 7974 (KLR)

The court dismissed the application for stay of execution on the basis that it had not been prosecuted since its filing and the applicant had not indicated the amount of security for due performance. The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate diligence in pursuing the application and did not satisfy...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 7974 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Victor Mbae Mugambi; Respondent: District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer, Mariani Adjudication Section; Respondent: Attorney General; Interested Party: M’Nthaka Mugwika
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 84 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed for non-prosecution
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Land Adjudication, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Land Adjudication Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Victor Mbae Mugambi

Petitioner

District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer, Mariani Adjudication Section

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

M’Nthaka Mugwika

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application for stay of execution pending appeal should be granted.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient grounds for stay of execution.
  3. 3 Whether the application was prosecuted diligently.

Ratio Decidendi

The court dismissed the application for stay of execution on the basis that it had not been prosecuted since its filing and the applicant had not indicated the amount of security for due performance. The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate diligence in pursuing the application and did not satisfy the requirements for the grant of stay of execution. The court further opined that the applicant could seek stay of execution in the superior court if so advised.

Court Disposition

application dismissed for non-prosecution

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution is dismissed for non-prosecution.
  • No costs are awarded.