[2018] KEHC 7974 (KLR)
The court dismissed the application for stay of execution on the basis that it had not been prosecuted since its filing and the applicant had not indicated the amount of security for due performance. The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate diligence in pursuing the application and did not satisfy...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 7974 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Victor Mbae Mugambi; Respondent: District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer, Mariani Adjudication Section; Respondent: Attorney General; Interested Party: M’Nthaka Mugwika
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 84 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed for non-prosecution
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Land Adjudication, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Victor Mbae Mugambi
Petitioner
District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer, Mariani Adjudication Section
Respondent
Attorney General
Respondent
M’Nthaka Mugwika
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for stay of execution pending appeal should be granted.
- 2 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient grounds for stay of execution.
- 3 Whether the application was prosecuted diligently.
Ratio Decidendi
The court dismissed the application for stay of execution on the basis that it had not been prosecuted since its filing and the applicant had not indicated the amount of security for due performance. The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate diligence in pursuing the application and did not satisfy the requirements for the grant of stay of execution. The court further opined that the applicant could seek stay of execution in the superior court if so advised.
Court Disposition
application dismissed for non-prosecution
Orders
- The application for stay of execution is dismissed for non-prosecution.
- No costs are awarded.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
41 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT CHUKA
CHUKA ELC CASE NO 84 OF 2017
FORMERLY MERU PETITON CASE NO.20 OF 2013
VICTOR MBAE MUGAMBI………….....................….PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION & SETTLEMENT OFFICER
MARIANI ADJUDICATION SECTION…..........…1ST RESPONDENT
ATTORNEY GENERAL………………..........……2ND RESPONDENT
M’NTHAKA MUGWIKA…………........………INTERESTED PARTY
RULING
1. This application is dated 2nd February, 2018. It seeks the following orders:
1. That the application be certified urgent and be heard in the first instance.
2. That this honourable court be pleased to issue orders for stay of execution pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
2. That the cost of this application be provided for.
2. It is supported by the affidavit of the applicant and has the following grounds:
a. That the applicant/respondent was dissatisfied with the decision and judgment of this court as he was never heard.
b. The applicant has lodged a notice of appeal and his intended appeal has good grounds and chances of success as the petition was misplaced on the first instant.
c. The applicant stands to suffer irreparably loss and damage because the applicant has been ordered to vacate the suit land.
d. The proceedings of the Land Adjudication Officer which are the basis of this matter does not support the claim by the petitioner at all.
3. The application is supported by the supporting affidavit of M’NTHAKA MUGWIKA sworn on 22nd February, 2018 which states:
I, M’NTHAKA MUGWIKA of P. O. BOX 645 CHUKA, do hereby make oath and state as follows:
1. That I am an Interested party herein thus conversant with the matter and competent to swear this affidavit.
2. That on the 21st November, 2017 judgment in the above mentioned matter was read.
3. That being dissatisfied by the decision of the honourable court I filed a notice of appeal, attached herein and marked MMI is a copy of appeal.
4. That there is need of stay of execution pending hearing and determination of the intended appeal.
5. That the orders sought if not granted will render the appeal nugatory.
6. That I stand to suffer irreparable loss and damage because I have been ordered to vacate the suit land.
7. That the appeal has good ground and high chances of success as the petition was misplaced on the 1st instant.
8. That the petitioner will not suffer prejudice if the application is allowed.
9. That the Interested party/applicant will suffer great loss if the petitioner goes ahead to be executed.
10. That what is deponed herein above is true to the best of my knowledge, belief and understanding.
4. The application was filed on 22nd February, 2018 vide a certificate of urgency and as at today, 13th March, 2018 the application remains unprosecuted. It is also noted that the applicant has not intimated the amount of deposit for security he is willing to be kept in the court’s custody.
5. In the circumstances, this application is dismissed for non-prosecution. It is opined that the applicant can seek stay of execution in the superior court.
6. No costs are awarded.
7. It is so ordered.
Delivered in open court at Chuka this 13th day of March, 2018 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Parties not in court.
P. M. NJOROGE,
JUDGE.