[2020] KEHC 7053 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 7053 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants, having pleaded guilty to assault causing actual bodily harm and served half of their six-month sentences, demonstrated good conduct and remorse while in prison. The Officer Incharge of Prison recommended their release, noting their youth and reformation. The court also considered...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 7053 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Victor Obonyo Okello; Applicant: Dalmas Ojodo Orwa; Applicant: James Ochopoli Odhach; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 51 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Outcome
Application for revision of sentence allowed; custodial sentences revised to suspended sentences.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentencing Revision, Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, Plea of Guilty, Prison Decongestion, Suspended Sentence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Revision Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm Plea of Guilty Prison Decongestion Suspended Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Victor Obonyo Okello

Applicant

Dalmas Ojodo Orwa

Applicant

James Ochopoli Odhach

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentences imposed on the applicants for assault causing actual bodily harm should be revised in light of their conduct and the circumstances of the offence.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants are suitable for release on suspended sentences due to prison decongestion and their demonstrated remorse.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants, having pleaded guilty to assault causing actual bodily harm and served half of their six-month sentences, demonstrated good conduct and remorse while in prison. The Officer Incharge of Prison recommended their release, noting their youth and reformation. The court also considered the need for prison decongestion due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the relatively minor nature of the injuries sustained by the complainant. In the absence of aggravating factors or prior criminal records, and given the inability to obtain a social inquiry report, the court held that there was sufficient cause to revise the sentences. The remainder of the custodial sentences...

Court Disposition

Application for revision of sentence allowed; custodial sentences revised to suspended sentences.

Orders

  • The remainder of the six-month prison terms for the applicants is suspended forthwith.
  • Applicants to be released from prison unless otherwise lawfully held.