[2014] KEHC 3690 (KLR)
The court found that the application for stay of execution was made without undue delay and that the applicants had complied with the court's order to deposit the full decretal sum in a joint interest-earning account in the names of the advocates for both parties. The court was satisfied that the appeal was arguable...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 3690 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Victor Warui; Appellant: Paul Weru Thumbi; Respondent: Peter Karimi Gikoroi; Respondent: David Munene Karimi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 13 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Stay Application Ruling
- Outcome
- application_allowed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeals Process, Security for Decretal Sum
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Victor Warui
Appellant
Paul Weru Thumbi
Appellant
Peter Karimi Gikoroi
Respondent
David Munene Karimi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Stay Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the deposit of the decretal sum in a joint interest-earning account is sufficient security.
- 3 Whether granting stay would prejudice the respondent or the minor beneficiary.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application for stay of execution was made without undue delay and that the applicants had complied with the court's order to deposit the full decretal sum in a joint interest-earning account in the names of the advocates for both parties. The court was satisfied that the appeal was arguable and that there was no evidence of the appeal being used to delay justice. Given that the decretal sum was for the benefit of a minor, and that the funds would remain secure pending the appeal, the court held that no prejudice would be suffered by granting the stay. Accordingly, the court allowed the application for stay of execution on the condition that the decretal sum...
Court Disposition
application_allowed
Orders
- Stay of execution of the judgment and decree in Nyeri CMCC No. 95 of 2013 and all consequential orders pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
- The decretal sum to remain deposited in an interest-earning account in the joint names of the advocates for the parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2014
VICTOR WARUI....................…............................................1ST APPELLANT
PAULWERU THUMBI.........................................................2ND APPELLANT
VERSUS
PETER KARIMI GIKOROI .................................................1ST RESPONDENT
DAVID MUNENE KARIMI .................................................2ND RESPONDENT
(Appeal arising from the Judgment of Hon. S. Ngungi
Principal Magistrate Nyeri in Civil Case No. 95 of 2013)
RULING
By an application dated 25th March 2014 the applicant under order 42 rule 6 moved the court for an order of stay of execution of the decree and all consequential orders pending determination of this appeal.
The application was filed under certificate of urgency and supported by the affidavit of Paul Weru Thumbi in which he deponed that at the trial before the lower court no records from the Registrar of Motor Vehicles was produced and therefore the ownership of the motor vehicle registration No. KAG 211N as at the time of the accident was not known. It was further deponed that there was a pending inquest on the occurrence of the accident.
It was deponed that the respondents have no known stable means of income and therefore there was a likelihood that if the decretal sum is paid out and the appeal succeeds the same might not be recovered and that the applicants have an arguable appeal with high prospects of success.
On behalf of the respondent a replying affidavit was filed in which it was deponed that the judgment of the trial court was properly entered and that the respondent is a man of means who owns LR No. NYERI/1SLAND FARMS/532 measuring 2. 77 Ha as well as motor vehicle registration No. KAS 701G Nissan Pick up and therefore the same can easily refund the decretal sum if the appeal succeeds.
It was further deponed that the decretal sum was for the use and benefit of the only child of the deceased and the decretal sum must be invested to the minor.
This application was certified urgent and temporary stay of execution given on condition that the decretal sum be deposited in an interest earning account in the joint names of the advocates for the parties.
At the time when the application was argued before me interpartes the applicant confirmed having complied with the order of the court in respect of the deposit of the decretal sum.
In the matter before me the application has been brought without undue delay, the applicant has deposited the total decretal sum in the joint names of the advocates herein and there is no evidence that the appeal is being used to delay justice. It is also clear from the memorandum of the appeal that the appeal is arguable.
Since the suit appealed from involved a child as stated by the respondent in paragraph 7 of the affidavit in reply for whose benefit the money must be invested, I take the view that no prejudice will be suffered if stay of execution pending appeal is granted on the condition earlier stated.
I would therefore allow the application in terms of prayer number (3) three that is to say the judgment in Nyeri CMCC No. 95 of 2013 entered on 28th February 2014 decree and all consequential orders therefrom are stayed pending the hearing and determination of this application with cost of this application being in the cause.
Dated, signed and delivered at Nyeri this 31st day of July 2014.
J. WAKIAGA
JUDGE
Mr. Kiama for Mr. Kinyua for the Respondent.
Mr. Koech for Miss Karani for the applicant.
Court: Ruling read in open court in the presence of the advocates.
J. WAKIAGA
JUDGE