[2024] KECPT 1380 (KLR)

[2024] KECPT 1380 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the failure to strictly adhere to the by-laws regarding the calling of the Annual Delegates Meeting and the extension of delegates' terms was adequately explained by the extraordinary circumstances of the Covid-19 pandemic and the intervention of police authorities. The Claimant did not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECPT 1380 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Timothy Bunyali Vikiru; Respondent: Nacico Sacco Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 387/E184 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim / Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed
Judges
BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Cooperative Societies Governance, By Laws Compliance, Annual General Meetings, Covid 19 Regulatory Impact
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Cooperative Societies Governance By Laws Compliance Annual General Meetings Covid 19 Regulatory Impact

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Timothy Bunyali Vikiru

Applicant

Nacico Sacco Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent contravened its by-laws by failing to follow the procedure for calling the Annual Delegates Meeting.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent unlawfully extended the terms of delegates whose terms had expired.
  3. 3 Whether the decisions and resolutions of the 40th Annual Delegates Meeting are null and void due to procedural irregularities.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the failure to strictly adhere to the by-laws regarding the calling of the Annual Delegates Meeting and the extension of delegates' terms was adequately explained by the extraordinary circumstances of the Covid-19 pandemic and the intervention of police authorities. The Claimant did not provide evidence that the Respondent was responsible for the police action or that the Respondent acted in bad faith. The Tribunal held that the actions taken were excusable under the circumstances, and therefore the prayers sought by the Claimant could not be sustained. The claim was dismissed for lack of merit.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed

Orders

  • The Statement of Claim dated 8/9/2021 is dismissed for lack of merit.
  • Each party to bear its own costs.