[2018] KEHC 10244 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 10244 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in prosecuting the suit, namely that the court file had been reported missing at the registry, which prevented further action. Consequently, the court was satisfied that sufficient cause had been shown to prevent dismissal for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 10244 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Vincent Gichomo t/a Kiche General Engineering Works; Defendant: Board of Governors Baba Dogo Secondary School
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 399 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Want of Prosecution and Transfer of Suit
Outcome
Suit not dismissed; transferred to Chief Magistrate's Court for disposal.
Judges
MM Kasango
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Transfer of Suit, Jurisdiction of Courts
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Transfer of Suit Jurisdiction of Courts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vincent Gichomo t/a Kiche General Engineering Works

Plaintiff

Board of Governors Baba Dogo Secondary School

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Want of Prosecution and Transfer of Suit

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff has shown sufficient cause why the suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution.
  2. 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear the matter or if it should be transferred to the Chief Magistrate's Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in prosecuting the suit, namely that the court file had been reported missing at the registry, which prevented further action. Consequently, the court was satisfied that sufficient cause had been shown to prevent dismissal for want of prosecution. Additionally, the court determined that the monetary value of the claim placed the matter within the jurisdiction of the Chief Magistrate's Court. Therefore, the suit was ordered to be transferred to the Chief Magistrate's Court at Milimani for disposal.

Court Disposition

Suit not dismissed; transferred to Chief Magistrate's Court for disposal.

Orders

  • The suit is not dismissed for want of prosecution.
  • The matter is transferred to the Chief Magistrate's Court Milimani for disposal.