[2021] KEELC 259 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 259 (KLR)

The court found that the officials of the BAKITWIKA (BATUKWITA) Association who purported to arbitrate the dispute were conflicted and could not be expected to act impartially or objectively. As a result, the award made by these officials was expunged from the record and returned to them. The court emphasized the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 259 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Vincent Mabonga Wabule; Defendant: Jacob Simiyu Wabule
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case E008 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Interlocutory Order; Mention Date Set
Outcome
Clan award expunged; mention date set; original agreement returned; clan officials discharged.
Legal Topics
Customary Land Disputes, Clan Arbitration, Impartiality of Arbitrators, Out of Court Settlement
Source Language
en
Land and Property Alternative Dispute Resolution Customary Land Disputes Clan Arbitration Impartiality of Arbitrators Out of Court Settlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vincent Mabonga Wabule

Plaintiff

Jacob Simiyu Wabule

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Interlocutory Order; Mention Date Set

  1. 1 Whether the clan officials were impartial and competent to arbitrate the dispute between the parties.
  2. 2 Whether the award by the conflicted clan officials should be accepted by the court.
  3. 3 How to proceed given the respondent's illness and lack of response to the originating summons.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the officials of the BAKITWIKA (BATUKWITA) Association who purported to arbitrate the dispute were conflicted and could not be expected to act impartially or objectively. As a result, the award made by these officials was expunged from the record and returned to them. The court emphasized the importance of impartiality in alternative dispute resolution processes, especially in family and land disputes. Given the respondent's illness and lack of response to the originating summons, the court appointed counsel to act pro bono for the respondent and granted time for the necessary documents to be filed. The court also ordered the return of the original sale agreement to...

Court Disposition

Clan award expunged; mention date set; original agreement returned; clan officials discharged.

Orders

  • The award dated 14th November 2021 by the clan officials is expunged from the record and returned to them.
  • The matter is to be mentioned on 19th January 2022 to allow respondent's counsel to file documents.