[2020] KEHC 543 (KLR)
The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional. The court exercised its discretion to resentence the petitioner, taking into account the period already served in prison. Since...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 543 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Vincent Nzive Muvandi; Petitioner: Francis Ndolo David; Petitioner: Joseph Kyalo Mwanzia; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Constitutional Petition 102 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Resentencing Judgment
- Outcome
- sentence_set_aside_and_petitioner_released
- Judges
- DO Ogembo
- Legal Topics
- Resentencing, Mandatory Death Sentence, Robbery With Violence, Supreme Court Precedent
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vincent Nzive Muvandi
Petitioner
Francis Ndolo David
Petitioner
Joseph Kyalo Mwanzia
Petitioner
Director of Public Prosecutions
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Resentencing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional following the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic.
- 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing and release based on time already served.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional. The court exercised its discretion to resentence the petitioner, taking into account the period already served in prison. Since the petitioner had already served 14 years, and the prosecution did not oppose his release, the court set aside the death sentence and resentenced the petitioner to a term equivalent to time served, resulting in his immediate release unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
sentence_set_aside_and_petitioner_released
Orders
- The sentence of death imposed on the petitioner is set aside.
- The petitioner is jailed for a term equivalent to time already served of 14 years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA
CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. 102 OF 2019
VINCENT NZIVE MUVANDI
FRANCIS NDOLO DAVID
JOSEPH KYALO MWANZIA.......................................PETITIONERS
VERSUS
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS...............RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT ON RESENTENCING
1. The Petitioner herein, Vincent Nzive Muvandi,together with 2 others were charged and convicted, with the offence of Robbery with Violence contrary to Section 296(2) of the Penal Code,where they were found guilty, convicted and sentenced to suffer death.
2. The particulars of the offence were that on the 2nd February 2008at11pm, at Salombo Club,Moi Avenue within Mombasa District, the Petitioners jointly with others not before court being armed with dangerous weapons namely a pistol and a knife, robbed off the Complainant a compressor machine and at or immediately before or after the time of such robbery threatened to harm the Complainant.
3. The Petitioner has exhausted his appellate rights, and is now in this Court for purpose of resentencing pursuant to the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic [2017] eKLR,in which the apex court found that the mandatory nature of the death sentence was unconstitutional and struck down Section 204 of the Penal Code to the extent that it prescribed mandatory death sentence upon conviction for murder.
4. M/S Wanjohi for the State relied on their submissions filed on 28th October, 2020, and submitted that the Petitioners be jailed for 14 years which he has already served with the effect that the Petitioner would be free and so they may be set free.
5. Pursuant to submissions by the DPP that the Petitioners be jailed for the time served of 14 years, I now hereby set aside the sentence of death imposed on Petitioner. In place thereof, I jail the Petitioner for a term equivalent to that already served of 14 years. The consequence is that the Petitioner is set free and released from prison unless otherwise lawfully held.
That is the Judgment of the Court.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Mombasa this 16th day of December, 2020.
E. K. OGOLA
JUDGE
Judgment delivered in chambers via MS Teams in the presence of:
M/S Wanjohi for State
Petitioner in person
Ms. Peris Court Assistant
Note:
In view of the declaration of measures restricting court operations due totheCOVID-19pandemic and in light of the directions issued by His Lordship the Chief Justice on15th March 2020,this Judgment has been delivered to the parties online with their consent. They have waived compliance withOrder 21 Rule 1of the Civil Procedure Rules which requires that all Judgments and Rulings be pronounced in open Court.