[2020] KEHC 7148 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 7148 (KLR)

The court found that the proceedings in the Principal Magistrate’s Court, Bondo Criminal Case No. 284 of 2013, were regular and that the sentence of 20 years imprisonment for the offence of defilement was lawful. There were no exceptional or irregular circumstances presented to warrant the exercise of the High...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 7148 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Vincent Ochieng Aringo; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 9 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Defilement, Sentence Revision, Criminal Conviction
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Defilement Sentence Revision Criminal Conviction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vincent Ochieng Aringo

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for the offence of defilement is amenable to revision in the present circumstances.
  2. 2 Whether the proceedings and sentence in Bondo Criminal Case No. 284 of 2013 were regular and lawful.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the proceedings in the Principal Magistrate’s Court, Bondo Criminal Case No. 284 of 2013, were regular and that the sentence of 20 years imprisonment for the offence of defilement was lawful. There were no exceptional or irregular circumstances presented to warrant the exercise of the High Court's revisionary jurisdiction. Consequently, the application for revision of sentence was declined and dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The request for sentence revision is declined and dismissed.