[2018] KEHC 2253 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 2253 (KLR)

The court found that there was no material on record to warrant a revision of the sentence imposed on the applicant. The sentence of 1 year and six months imprisonment for possession of uncustomed goods was not deemed excessive. Furthermore, the applicant failed to provide any mitigating circumstances that would...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 2253 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Vincent Ouma Onyango; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 140 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Possession of Uncustomed Goods, Sentence Revision, Mitigating Circumstances
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Possession of Uncustomed Goods Sentence Revision Mitigating Circumstances

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vincent Ouma Onyango

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of 1 year and six months imprisonment for possession of uncustomed goods was excessive.
  2. 2 Whether there were mitigating circumstances to warrant revision of the sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no material on record to warrant a revision of the sentence imposed on the applicant. The sentence of 1 year and six months imprisonment for possession of uncustomed goods was not deemed excessive. Furthermore, the applicant failed to provide any mitigating circumstances that would justify a reduction or alteration of the sentence, nor was there any basis to call for a Probation Officer’s report. As a result, the application for revision was rejected and dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The request for revision of sentence is rejected and dismissed.