[2021] KEELRC 887 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 887 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to provide credible evidence of the alleged power surge or any other sufficient cause for non-appearance. The court noted that all parties waiting to be admitted to the virtual session had been admitted, and the 1st respondent's advocate had acted professionally by relaying...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 887 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Vincent Shinaka Muliro; Respondent: The Board of Trustees, National Social Security Fund; Respondent: The Managing Trustee/CEO, National Social Security Fund; Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition E099 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Set Aside Dismissal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent
Judges
AN Makau
Legal Topics
Reinstatement of Dismissed Application, Non Appearance of Counsel, Virtual Court Procedure
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Reinstatement of Dismissed Application Non Appearance of Counsel Virtual Court Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vincent Shinaka Muliro

Applicant

The Board of Trustees, National Social Security Fund

Respondent

The Managing Trustee/CEO, National Social Security Fund

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Set Aside Dismissal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient cause to warrant setting aside the dismissal of the application for non-appearance.
  2. 2 Whether the absence of the applicant or his counsel was justified by technical or other valid reasons.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to provide credible evidence of the alleged power surge or any other sufficient cause for non-appearance. The court noted that all parties waiting to be admitted to the virtual session had been admitted, and the 1st respondent's advocate had acted professionally by relaying the applicant's communication. The court concluded that the motion to set aside the dismissal was devoid of merit and appeared to be an afterthought. Consequently, the application was dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion is dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent.