[2002] KECA 44 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 44 (KLR)

The court did not determine the substantive application for extension of time. Instead, the matter was removed from the day's cause list and deferred to a new date to be fixed in the Registry. No decision was made on the merits of the application.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] KECA 44 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Vinod Patel; Applicant: Ajay Shah; Applicant: Nitin Chandaria; Respondent: Investec Bank Limited; Respondent: Trust Bank Limited; Respondent: Michael Muhindi
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 92 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
adjourned
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Filing Out of Time
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Process Filing Out of Time

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vinod Patel

Applicant

Ajay Shah

Applicant

Nitin Chandaria

Applicant

Investec Bank Limited

Respondent

Trust Bank Limited

Respondent

Michael Muhindi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted an extension of time to file a notice of appeal and record of appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court did not determine the substantive application for extension of time. Instead, the matter was removed from the day's cause list and deferred to a new date to be fixed in the Registry. No decision was made on the merits of the application.

Court Disposition

adjourned

Orders

  • The matter is taken out of today's cause list and stood over to a new date to be taken in the Registry.
  • No order as to costs.