[2023] KEELRC 1712 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 1712 (KLR)

The court found that, although the applicants had previously offered to settle the decretal sum in instalments and the respondents had declined, it was just and equitable in the circumstances to allow liquidation of the decretal sum plus auctioneer charges in two equal instalments. The court considered the time...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1712 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Vintz Industries Limited; Applicant: Trident Insurance Company Limited; Respondent: Adrian Wambua Mutua; Respondent: Joyland Auctioneers
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E003 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Payment of Decretal Sum by Instalments and Stay of Execution
Outcome
Application partially allowed.
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Execution of Judgments, Payment by Instalments, Stay of Execution, Auctioneer Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Employment and Labour Execution of Judgments Payment by Instalments Stay of Execution Auctioneer Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vintz Industries Limited

Applicant

Trident Insurance Company Limited

Applicant

Adrian Wambua Mutua

Respondent

Joyland Auctioneers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Payment of Decretal Sum by Instalments and Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be allowed to liquidate the decretal sum by instalments.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution should be granted pending payment by instalments.
  3. 3 Whether the proclamation and attachment by the auctioneers should be lifted upon payment of attachment costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, although the applicants had previously offered to settle the decretal sum in instalments and the respondents had declined, it was just and equitable in the circumstances to allow liquidation of the decretal sum plus auctioneer charges in two equal instalments. The court considered the time elapsed since the application was filed and the parties' submissions. The court exercised its discretion to grant payment by instalments, ordered the first instalment to be paid within seven days and the final instalment within thirty days thereafter, and confirmed the stay of execution and lifting of the proclamation upon payment of attachment costs. Each party was ordered to bear...

Court Disposition

Application partially allowed.

Orders

  • Applicants to liquidate the decretal sum plus auctioneer charges in two equal instalments.
  • First instalment to be paid within seven days of the ruling; final instalment within thirty days of the first.