[2017] KEELC 3119 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant had failed to take any steps to prosecute the appeal for over two years after its admission, despite being prompted by the respondent's advocate. No opposition or explanation for the delay was provided by the appellant. The court held that the delay was inordinate and unjustified,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 3119 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Virginia Muchandi Muthengi; Defendant: Elisha K. Njagi
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 10 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. Costs awarded to the respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeal Procedure, Delay in Prosecution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Virginia Muchandi Muthengi
Plaintiff
Elisha K. Njagi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to inordinate delay by the appellant.
- 2 Whether costs should be awarded to the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant had failed to take any steps to prosecute the appeal for over two years after its admission, despite being prompted by the respondent's advocate. No opposition or explanation for the delay was provided by the appellant. The court held that the delay was inordinate and unjustified, warranting dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution under Order 17 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed and costs were awarded to the respondent.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. Costs awarded to the respondent.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
- Costs of the appeal and the application are awarded to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA
CHUKA ELC CA CASE NO. 10 OF 2017
FORMERLY MERU ELC CASE NO.06 OF 2014
VIRGINIA MUCHANDI MUTHENGI..........................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
ELISHA K. NJAGI.....................................................DEFENDANT
RULING
1. This application is dated 22nd February, 2017 and seeks orders:
1. That this appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution
2. The respondent do pay the costs of the entire appeal and this application.
2. The application is supported by the affidavit of the respondent/applicant sworn on 15th February, 2017 and has the following grounds:
1. That I am the applicant/Respondent herein and I am competent to swear this affidavit in support of the summons herein.
2. That my advocate was served with Memorandum of Appeal herein on the 18. 3.2014.
3. That after service of the memorandum of Appeal upon my advocates herein, I gave him instructions to proceed to represent me in the appeal.
4. That I have been informed by my advocate, which information I verily believe to be true, that the appeal was admitted by the honourable Judge on the 29. 9.2014.
5. That it is now over 2 years since the appeal was admitted and the appellant has not taken any step to set the appeal down for hearing.
6. That my advocate wrote to the appellant’s advocate on the 17. 11. 2014 informing him that the appeal had been admitted and that he should take steps to have the appeal prosecuted. Copy of the letter annexed and marked EN 1.
7. That my advocate informs me, that that letter was not responded to or acknowledged.
8. That the delay in prosecuting the appeal is inordinate and the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. During hearing of the application, Mr. Murango Mwenda for the respondent, told the court that the application had not been opposed through either grounds of opposition or through a replying affidavit.
4. Mr. Mwenda told the court that after the appeal was admitted way back on 29. 9.2014, the Appellant never took any step. He says that on 17. 11. 2014, he wrote to the appellant’s advocate requesting him to prepare a record of appeal and to set the case down for hearing. Mr. Mwenda laments that he got no response.
5. Mr. Nyenyire, for the appellant told the court that he had lost touch with his client. He left it to court to decide on how to determine the application.
6. I find it meritorious to dismiss this suit for lack of prosecution in terms of order 17, CPR.
7. In the circumstances, this suit is dismissed.
8. Cost are awarded to the Respondent in the Appeal.
9. It is so ordered.
Delivered in open court at Chuka this 16th day of March, 2017 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Murango Mwenda for the applicant/respondent
Nyenyire for the respondent
P.M. NJOROGE,
JUDGE.