[2015] KEHC 5387 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 5387 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had established sufficient grounds for the grant of leave to apply for orders of prohibition and mandamus. The removal of the caveat from the land parcel LOC 2/MAKOMBOKI/86 by the respondents, without notifying the applicant or following proper procedure, constituted a breach of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 5387 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Virginia Wangari Njenga (suing as the administrator of the estate of Charles Njenga Mukuna); Respondent: Land Registrar, Murang'a; Respondent: Edward Kinyua Nduriri (administrator of the estate of Henry Nduriri Nyaga); Respondent: Eliud Nicholas Gitonga
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kerugoya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 3 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Leave to Institute Judicial Review Proceedings
Outcome
Leave granted to apply for orders of prohibition and mandamus; leave to operate as a stay of further transactions on the suit land; directions given for filing and service of substantive motion.
Judges
BN Olao
Legal Topics
Removal of Caveat, Judicial Review Leave, Natural Justice Breach, Land Title Entries
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Removal of Caveat Judicial Review Leave Natural Justice Breach Land Title Entries

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Virginia Wangari Njenga (suing as the administrator of the estate of Charles Njenga Mukuna)

Applicant

Land Registrar, Murang'a

Respondent

Edward Kinyua Nduriri (administrator of the estate of Henry Nduriri Nyaga)

Respondent

Eliud Nicholas Gitonga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Application for Leave to Institute Judicial Review Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to apply for orders of prohibition and mandamus regarding the land parcel LOC 2/MAKOMBOKI/86.
  2. 2 Whether the removal of the caveat by the respondents without notice to the applicant breached the rules of natural justice.
  3. 3 Whether leave should operate as a stay of further transactions on the suit land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established sufficient grounds for the grant of leave to apply for orders of prohibition and mandamus. The removal of the caveat from the land parcel LOC 2/MAKOMBOKI/86 by the respondents, without notifying the applicant or following proper procedure, constituted a breach of the rules of natural justice. Given the ongoing litigation over the same parcel in Nyeri High Court Civil Suit No. 146 of 2011, the court determined that it was just and proper to grant leave and to order that such leave operate as a stay of further transactions on the land until the substantive motion is heard and determined. The court directed the applicant to file the...

Court Disposition

Leave granted to apply for orders of prohibition and mandamus; leave to operate as a stay of further transactions on the suit land; directions given for filing and service of substantive motion.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to apply for orders of prohibition and mandamus as prayed.
  • Leave granted shall operate as a stay of any further transaction in respect of parcel LOC 2/MAKOMBOKI/86 until determination of the Notice of Motion or further court orders.